Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because its morally wrong to cause animals to suffer,while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your opinoin
Experimental use of animals in researches is controversial issue over last few decades, though it has a vital role in many scientific and medical breakthroughs of past and present century. However, both animal right-extremists and anti-vivisectionist groups believe that animal researches are cruel and unnecessary, regardless of the purpose or benefit. Let us discuss both aspects of pharmaceutical use of animals here.
Scientists denotes the significance of animal testing in bio-medical sector as it serves the purpose of a human being tested. They points out that we share 95% of our genes with a mouse, making them an effective model for human body.They proves through many experiments that all animals are similar since organ systems and diseases to it are similar. The inevitability of pharmaceutical use of animals is exemplified by invention of cancer cure drugs, asthma inhalers and modern vaccines for polio, TB and meningitis. Moreover, the proponents argue that in an ecosystem sacrifice of an organism for the benefits of other is always justified. The above facts necessitates animal use of research programmes.
On the other hand, naturalists proclaim that rather than cruel, animal experiments are unreliable and even dangerous. Their first argument is that the basic moral right of a living organism is not respected, but reduced to mere tools in a scientific research. Next,the pain and sufferings that the animals subjected to is immense. Last, but equally important reason of the opponents is that, despite the similarities between humans and some animals, there are significant differences that can not be ignored. So complicated diseases of mankind may not be complex for other animals. For example, only one third of human cancer causing substances are harmful for other living beings. These points belittle the importance of live tests.
To conclude, only controlled and minimal live researches can be allowed considering the medical advancements and alternatives to animal tests are to be encouraged.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-01-27 | fathimasuk | 35 | view |
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because its morally wrong to cause animals to suffer,while others are in favour of them be 35
- Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skills more when doing group activities.to what extend do you agree 84
- nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other drugs.Some people argue that this should be banned because it is morally wrong while others are in favour of them.Discuss both views and give your openion 89
- some people think that all teenagers should be requiredto do unpaid work in their free time to helpthe local community.they beleive this would benefitvboth the individual teenager and society as a whole 84
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help losal community.they believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and the society as a whole.do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... benefit. Let us discuss both aspects of pharmaceutical use of animals here. S...
^^
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'They' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'point'
Suggestion: point
...e purpose of a human being tested. They points out that we share 95% of our genes with...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: They
... them an effective model for human body.They proves through many experiments that al...
^^^^
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'They' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'prove'
Suggestion: prove
... an effective model for human body.They proves through many experiments that all anima...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ability of pharmaceutical use of animals is exemplified by invention of cancer cu...
^^
Line 3, column 661, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'necessitate'.
Suggestion: necessitate
...er is always justified. The above facts necessitates animal use of research programmes. O...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'scientific research'.
Suggestion: scientific research
...respected, but reduced to mere tools in a scientific research. Next,the pain and sufferings that the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ere tools in a scientific research. Next,the pain and sufferings that the animals su...
^^^^
Line 5, column 634, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., only one third of human cancer causing substances are harmful for other living ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, third, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46666666667 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16285126396 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609523809524 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4114322352 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.625 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6875 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267834883693 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084912451119 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370227773023 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158455005959 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315156942978 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.