Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers. Thus, people are
losing the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that cell phones and computers play crucial roles in our lives. Some people
claim that this is the reason for declining communication skills. While I accept that modern
technologies make our lives more convenient, I believe that they have some negative effects on
our communication ability.
On the one hand, there are several advantages of using these electronic devices. The
biggest advantage is that cell phones and computers allow people to communicate with each
other more quickly and conveniently. For example, thanks to the Internet, managers can utilize
computers to contact their partners from other countries. As a result, they can save more time and
money to do other vital work of their business. Furthermore, many mobile phones and computers
now have Skype and therefore we can talk to friends and family who are far away. We can
actually see them, whereas before we had to rely on expensive long-distance calls or letters
which took ages to arrive.
On the other hand, this trend may have some drawbacks. Firstly, although people can
make many new friends via the Internet easily, they rarely meet and talk directly with each other.
This will let people be under illusions about their acquaintances in the virtual world. Secondly,
because of extreme focusing on cell phones or computers, people no longer want to spend time
with their true friends and their families. My close friend, for instance, is so addicted to chatting
and playing games on her smart phone that she ignores everyone when we gather and talk about
funny stories together.
In conclusion, although modern technologies bring us numerous benefits, it is true that
the communication ability of people will be improved if they restrict their usage of mobile
phones and computers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-23 | Hai Anh | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | Uppal singh | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | binhan_04 | 92 | view |
| 2021-04-21 | DIPAN PATIDAR | 56 | view |
| 2018-02-15 | Anna Trieu | 84 | view |
- Explain some of the way in which humans are damaging the enviroment.What can governments do to adress these problems. What can individual do. 61
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help local community.The believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole.Do you agree or disagree? 84
- : Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help local community.The believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole.Do you agree or disagree? 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- more and more people read the news on the internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news for the majority of people. Do you agree or disagree? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24054982818 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6401192112 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59793814433 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8931907306 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0666666667 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 22.0 4.38176352705 502% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187930823397 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642876560565 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555849831461 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0583336328385 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575831199535 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.