The two column charts below show the percentage of food and other items bought by three European countries in 1998 and 2008.
The bar charts compare the difference in the comsumption of food and other items in three major European nations in the years 1998 and 2008.
It is clear from the given charts that there was a sharp increase in the percentage of all items bought by three nations over the period. While Norway inhabitants appeared to buy food considerably higherin comparison with other nations, the other items seemed to be comsumed much more by Polland.
In 1998, about 15 per cent of food was purchased in Norway. This figure tripled after a decade, to just below 45 per cent. Meanwhile, the percentages of food consumed by Polland residents and the British in the first stage were just around 8 per cent and 5 per cent, followed by a dramatic rise by approxinately 20 per cent, to 30 per cent and 25 per cent, respectively.
The consumption for other items was by far highest in Polland, where about 13 per cent was bought in 1998, then continued rising to 35 per cent in the final year surveyed. Norway and UK, on the other hand, had the smaller comsumption rates although they also witnessed an upward trend from only 7 per cent and 3 per cent in 1998 to 20 per cent and 18 per cent, respectively after 10 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-01 | Jagdeep sahota | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-31 | Jagdeep sahota | 56 | view |
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry 78
- What are the benefits and drawbacks of keeping animals in zoos 75
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use 56
- This table shows how many people in millions used different form public transport in Milan between 2010 and 2014 72
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening, and what measures should be taken to tackle this problem? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55504587156 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53823965584 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56880733945 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.9343150039 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.125 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199314417419 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125821032814 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105263930079 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184899294495 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124958181186 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.