More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine.
Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world.
The majority of professionals are often moving from developing to developed countries particularly in the respected fields namely medicine and engineering. Some people believe that this kind of culture is natural. However, I argue that inciting a significant proportion of migration is actually ripping people from poor countries. This essay will discuss both sides with relevant examples.
On the one hand, supporters claim that exodus of talented people to alien countries is general because many of them tend to return back to the native countries to contribute for the development of the home n...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-10 | farshid.manami@yahoo.com | 73 | view |
- Discuss the advantage and disadvantage of giving international aid to poor countries. 84
- Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines. Should parents be made by law to immunise their children against common disease or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children?You should use your own 88
- Nowadays many students have the opportunity to study for part or all of their courses in foreign countries.While studying abroad brings many benefits to individual students, it also has a number of disadvantages.Do you agree or disagree? 81
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 85
- Money spent on exploration of space is a complete waste, it could be spend more effectively on improvements of living of people. To what extent do u agree disagree 85
Comments
Essay evaluation report
supporters claim that exodus of talented people to alien countries is general
supporters claim that the exodus of talented people to alien countries is general
Sentence: On top of that, abroad associations ensure greater jobs security which can be another the most motivating factors to join foreign spots.
Description: The tag a determiner/pronoun, singular is not usually followed by the
Suggestion: Refer to another and the
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 8.5 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 306 350
No. of Characters: 1714 1500
No. of Different Words: 211 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.182 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.601 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.881 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 140 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 115 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 82 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 55 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.125 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.566 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.276 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.499 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.04 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Sentence: On top of that,
Sentence: On top of that, abroad associations ensure greater jobs security which can be another the most motivating factors to join foreign spots.
Description: The tag a determiner/pronoun, singular is not usually followed by the
Suggestion: Refer to another and the
Dear sir, I really could not catch your suggestion, would you please simplify it so that I can avoid it in my further writing? Thank you sir.
two issues:
two issues:
1. after 'another', should not follow 'the':
Definitions of another
article
a. used to refer to an additional person or thing of the same type as one already mentioned or known about; one more; a further.
have another drink
synonyms: one more, a further, an additional
b. used to refer to a different person or thing from one already mentioned or known about.
come back another day
2. should be 'another... factor', not 'another... factors'
Now, it is very clear. Thank
Now, it is very clear. Thank you very much sir.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
...is general because many of them tend to return back to the native countries to contribute f...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, while, kind of, in other words, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74509803922 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9303067116 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.699346405229 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.136485895 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.875 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15604737651 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426835591382 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518655092476 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872172425112 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704549828867 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.