The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Some individuals believe that raising the cost of fuel is the most effective method to solving world's environmental problems. While I accept that this policy is good to some extent, I believe it is not the best because there are much better measure to reduce environmental issues.
it might be a good idea to increase the price of fuel such as coal, petrol and gas because of some reasons. Firstly, by making it more costly to purchase fuel, government can deter people from using personal vehicles. For example, if gasoline is more expensive, people will start using public transport rather tha...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | Thang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-08 | Vibhu Khurana | 78 | view |
| 2018-10-23 | nickynguyen01 | 56 | view |
| 2018-10-24 | nickynguyen01 | 56 | view |
| 2018-10-24 | nickynguyen01 | 56 | view |
- The table shows the percentage of workers in agriculture manufacturing and services in 7 European countries in 2014 71
- The bar chart shows the results of a survey conducted by a personnel department.The survey was carried out on two groups of workers: those aged 18-30 and those aged 45-60,and shows factors affecting their work performance. 84
- Some people think that in order to prevent illness and disease governments should make efforts in reducing environmental pollution and housing problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 83
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 75
- The table shows the percentage of workers in agriculture manufacturing and services in 7 European countries in 2014 70
Comments
In the last century,
In the last century, environmental problems has become increasingly worse.
the major causes are the phenomenon of human activity. I opine that,
augment the price of fuel is not only the way to solve environmental
problems but everybody should know their individual responsibility to solve
the problems. I partially agree with the statement.
to commence with, human activity plays an vital role for increasing the
environment pollution and other problems: global warming, flooding, disease
etc. However, government should increase the fuel price because of that,
they will use public transport instead of cars and other vehicles. other
advantage is when people stops using their own car they will start public
transport in result of reduce the carbon dioxide emission which is
responsible for global warming and climate change. government should take
responsible steps to save environment from those problems such as if
someone find to do environment degradation then government should pay a
huge amount of charge or 6 month prison. it is the best way to solve those
kind of problems. we will attain good amount of pure oxygen.
On the other hand, everyone has their own choice to use own car or public
transport. Even if government raise the price of fuel they will not use
public transport because they think differently that if they will use
public transport, they will not reach at job location or other location on
time. If they have car they will go easily without any problem. There are
lots of problems increasingly day by day for instance, over-population,
criminals, deceases etc. Only increase the gasoline price is the not only
the best way, individual person think towards the environment. For solving
problems, government or other NGOs organize camping towards the
environment and they have to travel all over the country and explain what
happen if they use more cars and other vehicles.
In a nutshell, according to me, we all have our individual responsibility
to save our earth by not doing bad activity towards the environment.
everybody's know that, health is wealth. if environment is better then we
are better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...re to reduce environmental issues. it might be a good idea to increase the pr...
^^
Line 4, column 569, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...uld lead to the minimization of natural resources exploitation which reduce the problem o...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23008849558 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86643711658 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560471976401 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5590093989 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.8125 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202522915218 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690246869791 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553211156207 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144104067406 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508065507022 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.