The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990.
The charts below compare developing and industrialised countries in terms of the average years of schooling, the numbers of scientists and technicians and the money spent on research and development in 1980 and 1990.
Overall, the figures of industrialised countries are much higher than those of developing nations. There are increases in participations in education and science in both kinds of countries, except in the money aspect.
In 1980, the people in developing nations spent around 3 years in school while that of industrialised countries was around 9 years. These figures, in 1990, rose to under 4 years and to nearly 11 years, respectively.
From 1980 to 1990, the proportion of science workers in industrialised countries saw a significant increase, from above 40 to around 70 per 1000 people compared to just a slight rise from 10 to under 20 people in developing countries. Likewise, the money invested in research and development of industrialised countries increased more than two-fold (from above $150 million to about $350 billion). In contrast, the figure in developing countries fell from about $50 billion to just around $20 billion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-07 | thudieu | 67 | view |
| 2017-04-13 | hai.entropy | 73 | view |
| 2017-04-13 | hai.entropy | 61 | view |
| 2017-04-13 | hai.entropy | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling 75
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 61
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 88
- Brick manufacturing 84
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3097826087 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18004451676 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527173913043 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5581523172 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.125 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365967982559 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156311867428 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830383583297 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23307941586 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724295500479 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.