The graph below illustrates the amounts of the fish and various kinds of meat consumption per person during a week by particular European nation from 1979 to 2004.
According to the graph in the 1979 beef was the most popular among these foods, with about 220 grams per week consumption per person. Although lamp and beef were consumed the same (approximately 150 grams), fish was the less eaten food (about 55 grams).
It is distinctively transparent that beef and lamp lost their appeal during these 25 years and they had a dramatic drop to almost 100 grams per person per week and 55 grams in 2004. Though the consumption of the fish slumped less significant than others, it maintained almost the same level until 2004.
On the other hand, chicken gradually became further prevalent and beef and lamb were overtaken by chicken in the 1980 and 1989. It followed the upward trend until 2004 reached to 250 grams per person per week.
To sum up, it is obviously manifest that during these years the consumption of the chicken had a significant increase in comparison with other foods, while the popularity of the other kinds of the food dipped.
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 84
- increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. to what extent do you agree or disagree? what other measures do you think might be effective. 33
- 100 years ago people thought that human race was steadily making progress in all areas of life nowadays there is less certainty that is so In what areas do you think the most important progress has been made so far In what areas more things need to be don 92
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishm 96
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experienc 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of the other kinds of the food dipped.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47600977908 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525252525253 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2179195535 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.625 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189620184783 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948246171703 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116177825118 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128886404871 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130711113233 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.