The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features ,and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie chart compare the information about five different fuel sources namely- oil, coil, natural gas, nuclear power and hydro power which are used for electricity production in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Overall, total unit production was almost doubled in 2000 compare to amount in 1980. Coal was most common fuel for generate electricity in both years, whereas nuclear element was the most used fuel for electricity generation in 2000.
In 1980, unit of coal based electricity production was shared a half portion compared with other, which were 20, 20, 10 units produced by hydro plant, natural gas and oil. In contrast, almost three-fourth fraction of electricity produced by coal, natural gas and oil, which made up 25, 25, 20 units respectively. While, nuclear and hydro power production were negligible compared to other sources, accounted for 15 and 5 units.
In 2000, still coal was most popular fuel for power production and raised by 25 units compared to the figure for 1980. Hydro power was also experienced a upward tendency and reaching at 36 units in Australia. The amount for natural gas and oil were at 2 units merely. However nuclear power plant dominated all other electricity production sectors in France, which constituted just below three- fourth ratio ( 126 units). Coal and oil shared an equal 25 units in France. Hydro plant and natural gas were not in counted with only 2 units for both sources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-18 | thienhanguyen | 78 | view |
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult such as the Sahara Desert or the Antarctic What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places 84
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
- rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects like philosophy and history and only offer practical degree courses that maximize chances of employment To wh 84
- The table shows the number of mobile phones and personal computers per 1000 people in 2003 in 6 different counties Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- As the world becomes technologically advanced, computers are replacing more and more jobs. Describe some job positions that may be lost because of computers, and discuss at least one problem that may result. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... 1980. Hydro power was also experienced a upward tendency and reaching at 36 unit...
^
Line 7, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nstituted just below three- fourth ratio 126 units. Coal and oil shared an equal ...
^^
Line 7, column 553, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted with only 2 units for both sources.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1209.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0375 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53554933233 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5125 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 359.1 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2801431462 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.75 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202458264434 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08860878691 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645679820083 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15951496849 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622740597763 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.