Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Today, by changing in the lifestyle, communication among humans has changed as well, and almost it differs with past. In fact, peoples' relationships is relating to several factors, not one thing. Although some people think make varied relationship with many friend is a positive characteristic, in my opinion maintaining a strong friendship with a small group people is more crucial.
First of all, technology has improved rapidly in the last years and it causes some bad effects on people communication. In spite of the technology development, people do not connect to each other, they do not go to each other's home, and do not invite each other to small party like in the past. In addition, they spend more daily time in the social networks like Instagram, Telegram, Whats app and so on. Thus, they cannot maintain their friendship with others. As a youth, who lives in the digital age, not only am separated with my old friends, but also am not able to maintain my new friendship. Therefore, all of these problems are based on technology development.
In addition, because of hectic lifestyle, the main goal of people has changed. Today, the earning money, buying new instruments and facilities are more important than communication and relationship with friends, neighbors and coworkers. Moreover, unfortunately, development in the world neither provide comfortable life for humans nor increases individuals’ friendships. Researchers show that the result of technology development has been a big gap between society members, family members and friends and they do not connect to each other like 50 years ago.
In summary, even though there are many people that do not have strong friendship, there are some individuals that have still maintained their communication with friends. The technology development and hectic life are the main reasons in order to provide this lifestyle for people and societies. Who can ignore the critical task of friendship in the society?
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun friend seems to be countable; consider using: 'many friends'.
Suggestion: many friends
...ple think make varied relationship with many friend is a positive characteristic, in my opi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...cial networks like Instagram, Telegram, Whats app and so on. Thus, they cannot mainta...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in fact, in summary, first of all, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 317.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27129337539 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02859489325 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564668769716 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1869120799 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.4375 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.45110844103 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264015561938 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078602735634 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718279329556 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165580597449 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377841706076 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.