The table below shows the proportion of income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998
The given table compares the percentage of income spend among adults and children on four differen items(food, electronic equipment, music and videos), in the United Kingdom in 1998.
Overall, what stands out from the table is that adults spend most of their income on food, whereas children spend the majority of their money on music and electronic equipment.
Looking at gender, women spend the most on food at 39% and on music at 5%, followed by 1% and 0,5% on electronic equipment and videos respectively. By contrast, men spend the most on food at 14% and on electronic equipment at 10%, followeed by 5% and 2% on music and video.
According to the data, a comparison among adult and children depicts that a quarter of adult spend their income to buy food while only 10% of children spend their money to buy it. The proportion of adults that spend their income on music was four times as small as that of children, at 5% and 39% correspondingly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-07 | Dede Miharja | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-12 | ihyaroza_yahya | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-16 | prathamp114 | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-19 | shreyk | 61 | view |
| 2021-05-14 | gur1040894 | 78 | view |
- Besides a lot of advantages, some people believe that the Internet creates many problems. 67
- If the paper from every morning edition of the nation’s largest newspaper were collected and rendered into paper pulp that the newspaper could reuse, about 5 million trees would be saved each year. This kind of recycling is unnecessary, however, since t 16
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 95
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tronic equipment. Looking at gender, women spend the most on food at 39% and ...
^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...end the most on food at 39% and on music at 5%, followed by 1% and 0,5% on electr...
^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt and videos respectively. By contrast, men spend the most on food at 14% and on...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73652694611 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62099030158 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479041916168 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 22.2666916168 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 131.833333333 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8333333333 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0794078490361 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052573203278 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468676855249 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0642802018988 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440383892375 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.