The table below shows the proportion of income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998

Essay topics:

The table below shows the proportion of income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998

The table illustrates the amount of earnings spent by different age groups of citizens in UK on four products in the year 1998.

Overall, adults, men and women spent maximum on food and least on videos. However, children, boys and girls spent more in music and least in food except girls who were least interested in electronic equipment.

Adults expenditures were about 25% on food products among which women were at 39% and men at 14% whereas adults spent least on video items at merely 1% in which men and women contributes 2% and 0.5% respectively. In addition, both were equally interested in music and spent 5% only.

Moreover, children were more inclined towards music and hence expenditure is maximum up to 39% in which boys and girls were spending almost similar at 38% and 40%. On the contrary, children did not prefer food items mostly because they were spending only 10% on it. Albeit, girl were not interested in electronic equipment as they spent nearly 5%.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-09-07 Dede Miharja 73 view
2022-06-12 ihyaroza_yahya 84 view
2021-07-16 prathamp114 84 view
2021-06-19 shreyk 61 view
2021-05-14 gur1040894 78 view
Essays by user shreyk :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...um on food and least on videos. However, children, boys and girls spent more in m...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, moreover, whereas, in addition, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87425149701 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50326618009 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556886227545 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5154544211 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.75 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118592635002 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063804291932 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567340841986 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0925717909989 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661661611464 0.0819641961636 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.