Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The history is always the best examples for us to see what conclusion can be resulted from our decisions, by analyzing the past, we have more understanding of the logic and method to help us do things better in the future, as many problems can be in the same situation as before. Therefore, the claim on totally denying the value of knowing about the past is not true from my point of view.
There can be some extents that the knowing of past will not help us to make decisions in the contemporary world, as the technological improvements will allow us to have different solutions to the same problem, and the decisions that people take while solving problems is different from the past. Take the detections as an example. In the past, the detectors and police had little sources to track the murderer as the means for searching only limited to fingerprints, hairs, testimonies from the nearby people or other viable sources. This few evidences can take months to years for the police to catch the criminal suspect, and the efficiency is limited due to the lack of technologies in tracking. However, when the technology improved, DNA ejected from blood and video recorded from nearby cameras can be the sources for tracking, and tiny evidence can be seen by the microscope. The past experience for tracking is not considered as efficient and useful for the nowadays detectors, and the past experiences are hard for people to apply to make decisions on how to gather the evidence now. Therefore, in this case, the past experience has little to do to help people make important decisions today.
However, most of the past experience does provide dramatic value when people are facing new problems to solve today. The World Was One and Two leave people in the world with traumatic scars, which are hard to be recovered even it has been almost 80 years since the events. Today, when big countries are having conflicts in their interest, the past will remind them how much harm will it do to the world if they cannot prevent themselves from starting the war. Therefore, all people believe that peace is the main destination that the world should be working on together, as the past tells them the economics, politics, and citizens will suffer huge pains if the wars happen again. The past experience teaches people what we should do and how should we perform when conflicts present. In addition, the world is sometimes circulating the things happened in the past, such as the vicissitude of the generations of empires, and the birth to death of the human.
The world is like a huge machine which has its laws. Therefore the past is a good resource for us to understand what will happen in the future, and what ramification will be drawn. Understanding the past and combining the new thoughts and novel technology today will bring us best ways to make important decisions.
- Over the past year the Crust Copper Company CCC has purchased over 10 000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia Mining copper on this land will inevitably result in pollution and since West Fredonia is the home of several endangered 84
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporti 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 887, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...ence can be seen by the microscope. The past experience for tracking is not considered as effic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 994, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...ful for the nowadays detectors, and the past experiences are hard for people to apply to make de...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1122, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...dence now. Therefore, in this case, the past experience has little to do to help people make im...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...ecisions today. However, most of the past experience does provide dramatic value when people...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 686, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...uge pains if the wars happen again. The past experience teaches people what we should do and ho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 54, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...like a huge machine which has its laws. Therefore the past is a good resource for us to u...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 274, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'us the best'.
Suggestion: us the best
...s and novel technology today will bring us best ways to make important decisions.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2380.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 496.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79838709677 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62152599514 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473790322581 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 728.1 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.2035786819 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.222222222 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5555555556 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.05555555556 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18421540995 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672142706423 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450516227332 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110494025783 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416185139936 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.