Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The present has arrived at its existence mainly due to the hurdles crossed by the intellectual brains in the past. Knowing about the past can greatly benefit people to take important decisions today.
Experience gained by individuals in a field is far more effective than book knowledge and it can only be attained after learning about the good or bad decisions in the past. Companies prefer hiring experienced people against the freshers recently graduated from college who studied many books. In fact, knowledge in the books are written after immense route of experiments and failed theories in the past. Without such information, humans today would not be as developed to treat complicated medical disorders or invent the internet, an impressive technology to connect people with a click of button communicating over satellites that are outside the earth.
While taking decisions in implementing laws for a country, it is always helpful to look at the history and find out if similar decisions were taken for the people and learn the impacts caused by it. Certainly, good impacts in the past for the similar law would most probably result in a healthy law implementation in the present for the country and benefit the citizens. One can argue that the times have changed and the response of people could be different from the past after implementation of a certain law. This argument does not hold true most of the time as can be observed in ‘equal rights law’ or ‘no discrimination law’ and much more. Humans have always wanted equal rights in jobs, services, etc. It can never go other way round that humans give up their rights.
From the past incidents happened to a person, the experience gained can greatly help in taking decisions if similar situations arise. History greatly gives hints though ambiguous to form a new law’s response from the people in a country. From above, we see that learning the past can be an added advantage while taking critical decisions in the present.
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 83
- Those who see their ideas through regardless of doubts or criticism others may express are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reas 50
- The following was presented as part of a business plan by Apex Corporation To answer the increased demand for artisan coffee Apex Corporation is releasing a new line of coffee Gourmet Select Apex Corporation will first introduce the coffee into major supe 66
- In an attempt to improve highway safety Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways But this effort has failed the number of accidents has not decreased and based on reports by the highway patrol man 59
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and support 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 334.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0748502994 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71327038974 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568862275449 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.75717611 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2666666667 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 5.21951772744 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153928187681 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596303211106 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628468582824 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111325137884 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370693263742 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.