whether or not should animals be used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products is widely debated with many people claiming that animal should not be use to develop new medicines and to test the safety of our product.
In my opinion this notion merit serious consideration and I will explain why in this easy with pertinent argument and examples. There are myriad argument in support of my stance. The most conspicuous one is that we do not not to put human in danger as a result of developing new medicines that can lead to death.
Another pivotal aspect of my argument is that the risk associated with the chemicals use for product of this product. This chemical could be detrimental to human heath during testing.
For, instance underpinning the aforementioned, an empirical of this is to always us animals experiments to develop new medicines for the safety of human life and to reduce complication associated with medicine testing on humane life.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefit/ impacts or drawbacks of animal experiment are too great to be ignore. Nevertheless, the use of human experiment should not be overlooked either.
- Motorways help people travel quickly and cover long distances but they also cause problems What are the problems of motorways and what solutions are there 81
- Most employers do job interviews before offering a position to a person. Do you think this is the best way to do it, or are there better alternatives? What is the best method of choosing employees in your opinion? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made the world a better place to live. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 60
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 77
- A rise in the standard of living in a country seems to only benefits cities rather than rural areas. What problems might this difference cause? How might the problems be reduced? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whether
whether or not should animals be used to develo...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 2, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
whether or not should animals be used to develop new m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: BE_USE_TO_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ople claiming that animal should not be use to develop new medicines and to test th...
^^^
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ople claiming that animal should not be use to develop new medicines and to test th...
^^^
Line 2, column 219, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: not
... The most conspicuous one is that we do not not to put human in danger as a result of d...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nstance underpinning the aforementioned, an empirical of this is to always us an...
^^
Line 4, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inning the aforementioned, an empirical of this is to always us animals experime...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, nevertheless, so, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 1615.20841683 62% => OK
No of words: 203.0 315.596192385 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93103448276 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.808469388 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 176.041082164 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 506.74238477 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.5384372025 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.222222222 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305888634844 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115353672159 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131553984878 0.0667982634062 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176320010763 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146050809622 0.056905535591 257% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.