The graph below shows Internet users as a percentage of population in USA, Mexico and Canada from 1999 to 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The graph illustrates the number of people who used the Internet as a proportion of population in three countries over the period of 20 years (from 1999 to 2009).
It is clearly that the percentage of population using the Internet in the USA, Mexico and Canada all steadily increased each year. While a much larger percentage of Canadians and Americans accessed to the Internet in comparison with Mexicans, Canada experienced the fastest growth in Internet usage.
In 1999, the Internet was most popular in the USA (20%), followed by Canada and Mexico, at about 10% and 5% respectively. From 1999 to 2005, all three countries saw an increase in the number of people using the Internet. Both Canada and USA reached approximate 70 percent of population accustomed to the Internet, compared to Mexico with only 25 percent.
In 2009, the first ranked belonged to Canada. Almost 100 percent of Canadians used the Internet, compared to about 80% of Americans and 40% of Mexicans.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-01 | lucluc | view | |
| 2021-08-12 | thzelda_070195 | view | |
| 2021-01-19 | Mei Lin_Yu | 56 | view |
| 2020-12-13 | vothithuymy | view | |
| 2020-12-13 | vothithuymy | 100 | view |
- The gap between the rich and the poor is becoming much wider: the rich richer, the poor even poorer. What problems can the situation cause and give the solutions. 100
- Nowadays people always throw the old thing away when they buy new things and we are living in a throwaway society What factors cause this phenomenon What problem does leads to 92
- Research suggests that the majority of criminals who are sent to prison would commit crimes when set free? What are the reasons? What can be done to solve the problem? 78
- Computer technologies are more accessible and cheaper as the result more adults work at home and children study at home Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Early technological developments brought more benefits and changes to people’s life than the recent technological developments. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01840490798 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74058082231 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564417177914 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1919794291 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.25 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288117496559 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133887035778 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521403705023 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17744706691 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584225796069 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.