Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Such is the technological revolution that the human relationship has changed significantly in various ways. And in my opinion, this development brings both positive and negative effects.
Admittedly, technology has had a substantial impact on business, education and social life. Firstly, the Internet and telephones allow businessmen to communicate with partners from other counterparts without meeting each other. Secondly, online applications like Skype have led to new method of teaching – the interactive teaching which students can take online video lessons with a teacher in a different city or country. Finally, numerous people are likely to used social networks such as Facebook, Twitter or Instagram to make friends and to look for partners who share the common interests and they tend to communicate through texts rather than face-to-face meetings.
Recently, technology’s influence on the way people interact has been a controversial issue. On the one hand, some people claim that these developments can be extremely beneficial. In the early times, people used to keep in touch with each other by exchanging letters or telegrams. However, interactions via telephones video calls or mails enormously benefit people because of its easily access and low time consumption. On the other hand, some people argue that the ability of new technological communication has become an adverse development which has led to the lack of real interaction and the result of isolating people. Techies, for instance, are always checking their phones, texting messages, surfing the websites rather than talking to their friends when hanging out together. Moreover, teenagers tend to make friends online instead of mixing with their peers and these virtual relationships are poor substitute for real friendships.
In conclusion, technology certainly has had an influence on communication between people and there are convincing arguments both for and against this development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-11 | milanree1527@yahoo.com | 56 | view |
- Task 1 the three charts below show the percentage of the method which students travel to school in Britain Australia and Singapore Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- The table below shows the results of a survey to find out what members of a city sports club think about the club’sactivities, facilities and opening hours.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make any comparisons 73
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The bar chart below shows Scotland’s exports to the rest of the UK and the rest of the world for the year 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons whe 67
- Young people in the modern world seem to have more power and influence than any previous young generation. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6632996633 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09921640619 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626262626263 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0658137773 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.142857143 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286116897032 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09093920438 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493919617927 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153384814568 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584705248373 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.