TPO 15-1

Essay topics:

TPO 15-1

The strategies which is mentioned by the reading to be disposed of cane toads- a kind of bulky amphibian which has been intentionally introduced to Australia and caused many dramatic obstacles in its ecosystem- seems to be unlikely to be exploited due to several conspicuous reasons.

First of all, although the reading proposes the construction of fence as a method, The professor believes that it won't be beneficial feasibly due to the fact that many young toads as well as the eggs inhabit in rivers and streams. As a result, water can carry many of them over the fences because they should cross over the fences to initiate a living.

Secondary, Although the professor admits that it is possible to ask people to gather cane toads and make them disappear, It will be a risky decision because many people can't distinguish the differences between frogs and cane toad because they resemble each other very much apparently. Consequently, this will lead to a decrease in number of frog species.

last but not least, As many of the introduced cane toads are transported to Central America, the idea of injecting viruses to them in order to get rid of them sounds to be wrong. As a matter of fact, native cane toads are vital parts of the ecosystem in the America and their being infected to these kinds of viruses will lead to a catastrophic result.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2017-09-06 zhrnrz1992 3 view
2017-09-06 zhrnrz1992 81 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user zhrnrz1992 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...be a risky decision because many people cant distinguish the differences between fro...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Last
... decrease in number of frog species. last but not least, As many of the introduce...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, consequently, first, if, second, so, well, kind of, as a matter of fact, as a result, as well as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1125.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80769230769 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70337232545 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568376068376 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 21.2450331126 155% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.5566487817 49.2860985944 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.714285714 110.228320801 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4285714286 21.698381199 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 18.1428571429 7.06452816374 257% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391492653991 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177194794388 0.0996497079465 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778219057913 0.0662205650399 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235047983376 0.162205337803 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072415888727 0.0443174109184 163% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.3589403974 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.7273730684 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.498013245 145% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.