Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Throughout human history, helping have been one of the most inseparable part of human behavior. It goes without saying that where every individuals are putting all their efforts to have a better community in such a sophisticated world. But here comes a question whether nowadays people take their time to help out their communities or not. Some people hold the view that the contribution of people in communities' issues has been arisen in the last decades. As far as I am concerned, I firmly believe that this contribution has decreased owing to some conspicuous reasons. In what follows, I will substantiate my points of view on this issue.
The first exquisite reason to be mentioned is that in the world we call it modern, by advance in technology and emergence of copious cutting edge gadgets including satellites, internet and TV, people do not have enough time to participate in social activities. However, these tools have made people's lives easier, it stocks them in a hectic lifestyle in which they have to try hard to focus on their personal life. Take an employee as an example; he works hard from the dawn until the late night. He does not have enough time to meet his friends and family members let alone contributing in community improvement.
Another subtle point which deserves some words here is that people living in bustling cities, put all the improvements and changes to government. They believe that if they pay taxes, it will be government and administration organ's responsibility to take time for the community. An established survey indicates the amount of cooperation of people in social activities is 15 percent which means that they are reluctant to do so. They provided more research to find out why. Thus, they make some questionnaire to make some statistical data. The results were surprising: more than 90 percent of people were unwilling to take their time for helping their societies because they thought that government was in charge for such issues.
To put it briefly, contemplating all factors and reasons, one soon realizes that by advance in technology and living in metropolitan cities the level of contribution of people in social activities has declined and they do not care about their communities. I strongly recommend people to consider their communities more since it is where they and their children can grow up and progress.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | mucahit11 | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | SSN775 | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | naziii | 76 | view |
- top 15.1 3
- Integrated TPO 42 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 18-1 78
- TPO 41Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they change the specific arguments presented in the reading passage. making sever rules for recycling of coal ash. 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, first, however, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1990.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03797468354 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85736776646 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556962025316 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5202083384 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.555555556 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9444444444 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.45110844103 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171202871138 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514577831998 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050130156682 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108763222097 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0140079815064 0.0645574589148 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.