The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Most of the time, life could be hard. We might face some difficulties while we grow up, or challenge our selves because we want to succeed. Happiness is one of the ultimate goals that everyone pursues in life. I agree with the statement that the ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily for the following reasons.
Firstly, we may face difficulties in life, and it is important for us to have some people around to support us. Good friends would be supportive because we do the same thing to them when they have a hard time. We call them "old friends" because they grew up with us. This actually reminds me of one of my high-school friends, Joyce, a person I have known for 10 years. When I recently had a breakup, she was the first person I wanted to talk with. Similarly, when Joyce lost her job, she called me and cried for three hours. At the end, we both got through our difficult time of life, thanks to the maintaining of our friendship.
Next, old friends are the people that know you the best, and that makes life a lot of happier and fun. Every time I hang out with my old friends, we can immediately make the decision like which restaurant to go or which place to travel because we know each other so well. If there is a friend in our group doesn't like spicy food, and then we would avoid ordering spicy dishes when we go out to eat. And more importantly, we would feel more relaxed when we spend time together.
In conclusion, I prefer to keep the old friends than knowing more new friends. I think that a good-quality relationship is one of the keys leads to a happy life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...he ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 321, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...th a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...well. If there is a friend in our group doesnt like spicy food, and then we would avoi...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, firstly, if, may, similarly, so, then, well, while, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 320.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.41875 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47455014851 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559375 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9483475076 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1764705882 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8235294118 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31660043398 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100344976593 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178913426579 0.0737576698707 243% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215569241398 0.150856017488 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.168054313233 0.0645574589148 260% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 58.1214874552 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 10.9000537634 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.