TPO 4
The reading claims that dinosaurs like modern birds and mammals have endotherm that keep their body temperatures constant. However, the lecture finds all the idea dubious and presents some evidence to refuse them all.
The author argues that dinosaur fossils discovered in polar regions and dinosaur for maintaining their temperature and be active in that region must be endotherm. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea when a cold climate arrives dinosaur could migrate or hybernate. Also, the polar regions was warmer in the past.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that there is a relation between position and movement of the legs and endothermy and dinosaur can do physical activity like running because of the endothermy and that is the reason their legs are positioned underneath its body. On the contrary, the professor underline the fact the explanation of dinosaur leg's position is to support its weight.
Finally, the reading asserts that bone of dinosaurs have a structure named haversian canals. This structure helps dinosaurs to grow quickly and that is sign of endothermy and fossilized bones of dinosaurs have haversian canals densly. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that dinosaur rate of growth change in different climates and these are characteristic of animals without endothermy. If dinosaur have endotherm, their body temperature stay constants. Therefore, their body growth stay rapid and does not change.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading claims that dinosaurs like modern birds and mammals ...
^^
Line 2, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... The author argues that dinosaur fossils discovered in polar regions and dinosaur...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38793103448 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72250059917 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.220197793 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.166666667 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.