The graph compares the number of UK higher education students and the line chart illustrates the states' budget for per student between the year 1991 and 2001. The pie chart shows the students’ economic family background at the year of 1991. Overall, most students came from medium-income families, and although the number of university students increased, the government spending for each student decrease over the last decade of 20th century.
In 1991, it is clear from the percentage shown in the pie chart, that students originated from medium-income background was the highest figure, at 60%, while that from high-income and low-income family each represented 32% and 8% respectively.
From 1991 to 1999, the number of UK university students rose gradually, reaching its highest point at approximate 2.2 million in 1999, and then slightly reduced to exactly 2 million in 2001.
Over the same period, the government spending per student took a steep dive from over 6500 pounds in 1991 to under 5000 in 1993, followed by a stayed constant at roughly 4800 pounds throughout the remainder of the period
The graph compares the number of UK higher education students and the line chart illustrates the states' budget for per student between the year 1991 and 2001. The pie chart shows the students’ economic family background at the year of 1991. Overall, most students came from medium-income families, and although the number of university students increased, the government spending for each student decrease over the last decade of 20th century.
In 1991, it is clear from the percentage shown in the pie chart, that students originated from medium-income background was the highest figure, at 60%, while that from high-income and low-income family each represented 32% and 8% respectively.
From 1991 to 1999, the number of UK university students rose gradually, reaching its highest point at approximate 2.2 million in 1999, and then slightly reduced to exactly 2 million in 2001.
Over the same period, the government spending per student took a steep dive from over 6500 pounds in 1991 to under 5000 in 1993, followed by a stayed constant at roughly 4800 pounds throughout the remainder of the period.
- Many people go to university for academic study. More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified worker such as electricians and plumbers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- In many countries, children are becoming overweight and unhealthy. Some people think that the government should have the responsibility. what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Fast food is now universally available in most countries and is becoming increasingly popular. Some feel that this is a positive trend, while other do not. What about your opinions on this? 89
- The consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat. 78
- Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 22, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... million in 2001. Over the same period, the government spending per student took...
^^
Line 8, column 22, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... million in 2001. Over the same period, the government spending per student took...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 33.7804878049 189% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1869.0 965.302439024 194% => OK
No of words: 358.0 196.424390244 182% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22067039106 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 3.73543355544 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82146273716 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.293296089385 0.547539520022 54% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 516.6 283.868780488 182% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.8151155924 43.030603864 179% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.909090909 112.824112599 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5454545455 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 8.0 3.83414634146 209% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415080272714 0.215688989381 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.240220632858 0.103423049105 232% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120300068285 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225805485525 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162328910063 0.0819641961636 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.2329268293 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.