the graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Given is a graph illustrates how much CO2 emission in metric tonnes is used by each individual between 1967 and 2007 in Sweden, Britain, Italy and Portugal. It is clear from the graph that in the United Kingdom produced more CO2 than other countries.
As it can be observed at the first glance that although overall trend in the Uk’s CO2 emission was consistently downward, it had the most CO2 production in 1967 almost 11 metric tonnes in comparison with Sweden with little less than 9 MT, Italy a bit higher than 4 and Portugal almost 1 MT. It is obviously clear that Sweden saw a dramatic rise in 1977 to a high of 10.5 MT, but it plummeted to almost 7 Mt 1987 and it had steady decrease to a low of 505 MT in 2007. It is evident that Both Portugal and Italy had an upward trend finished in 2007 respectively 5 and almost 8. In addition, Sweden and Portugal had the same CO2 emission in 2007 of nearly 7.
It can be conclude that the UK had a downward trend during this period, also, in Sweden from1977 to the end. However, there was a spectacular increase in Portugal and Italy between 1967 and 2007.
- some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. they say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. to what extend do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their was 56
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cellphone tracking and security cameras.) In many cases, the people being monitored are unware that this is happening.Do you think the advanta 78
- car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam.how true do you think this statement is?what measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars? 67
- In the past when students did a university degree, they tended to study in their own country. Nowadays, they have more opportunity to study abroad. What are the advantages and disadvantages to this development? 78
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 907.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.38164251208 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49371774787 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541062801932 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.4073438136 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.375 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269801515611 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14060267064 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794424934942 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203120850658 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479185161196 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.42 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.