Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past.
Throughout history, in all civilized societies, the issue of children's education engendered copious controversies among people. Some people may hold the view that parents today have important role on children education. However, some other may hold an opposite viewpoint and believe that parents were more interested in children's education in the past. As far as I am concerned, parents today are more involved in their children's education today because not only does technology developed, but also they have experiences.
The first reason to point out is that development of technology made parent to get more involved in children's education. Nowadays, advancement in the technology happening in a very fast pace which cause new thing emerge. To demonstrate, plentiful game company are that making many games with great quality. Therefore, children have penchant to playing this game and this make a very arduous situation for their parents. They have to control their children to not get addicted to this game and focus on their study. For example, on of my clever friend after getting a play station, get addicted to this game consul and lost his tendency to study and his parent taking his play station. Also, new social program was created and make children addicted to using them all the time. Hence, parents by observing this affect get more involve in their children's education.
A further more subtle point is that parent are knowledgeable and more experiences today. in the past, parents did not have any information about children education because they were not education. They think it is essential for children to make this decision by him self. In contrast, parents today know that it is vital to control their children education and it is proven that children today are lazy and they are unwilling for studying. Furthermore, they have to check their children. Moreover, people know for getting successful in future it is crucial to continue your education. For instance, when people see someone have a perfect life style they immediately understand he has a high degree of education. Hence, they try to motivate their children and enhance their confidence by telling this fact and push them to finish their education in a great university for better future.
To make a long story shorted, based on the aforementioned arguments, due to the fact that technology advanced and parents are well educated know, parents are more involved in their children's education. Consequently, it is highly recommended, parents compel their children to study hard since it has more beneficial for them in future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | shayanhgh | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | DAISY CHANG | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | Mehrnaz | 3 | view |
| 2018-11-18 | shivaaaa | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-15 | Meysam-Khan | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...owledgeable and more experiences today. in the past, parents did not have any info...
^^
Line 3, column 509, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ck their children. Moreover, people know for getting successful in future it is c...
^^
Line 4, column 325, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...d since it has more beneficial for them in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2190.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17730496454 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73742328534 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486997635934 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 692.1 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4987603101 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5454545455 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2272727273 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31818181818 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345697679621 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126975913117 0.076458572812 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947494078148 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257920657448 0.150856017488 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598105441131 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.