While the analyses reveal that the qualities we have during birth exert far more impacts on our individualities and advancements than any actions we carry out in our lives, i believe that involvements are the paramount determinant of an individual's characteristic. This essay will discuss firstly the repercussion of genes on human's behaviour and secondly, the effect of exposures on the conduct of human kinds with relevant examples.
On the one hand, the supporters insist that the hereditary component is exclusively accountable for the identity and progression of a citizen because of the following two reasons. Primarily, take criminal attitudes for an instance. Despite growing up in peaceful environments, the offender Stephen Mobley, who committed several violent crimes, was exonerated owing to the presence of the warrior gene, which is potentially liable for leading to fierce clashes according to experts. Next, apart from this scientific finding, chromosome also dominates various other features. For illustration, the remarkable similarities in hobbies and interests can be described between twins when they were reunited after being separated from delivery as the pairs dressed similarly and had the same hair cut or glasses.
On the other hand, i strongly claim that the experiences such as cultural and situational factors are considerably more decisive than the inborn nature. To begin with, considering the cultural values, if a person is fond of reading and creating abstract paintings, there is a high probability that the body will behave responsibly, compared to those folks who do not manifest any interest will be more insensitive and agitative in attributes. In the second place, positional elements may diminish some aspects of one's personality. For example, even though a man might be successful in the future, but the character, who has miserably failed one after another, generally would not prefer to retake the assessment at least for a period of time. This explains why inborn traits are nowhere near as potent as realities.
In conclusion, presumably, participations can be favoured much more influential than genetic systems and personally, i think more studies ought to be conducted in coming days on behalf of inheritable evolution to gain confidence of public and avoid heavy criticisms.
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 66
- The chart below gives information about southland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025 20 for test purposes use and refer to the current year 85
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities.Others,however,say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both views and give your own op 97
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 ad 2010 about one university.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The pie charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Oman and Spain in 2005 and projections for 2055 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 57
Essay evaluation report
even though a man might be successful in the future, but the character,
Description: 'even though' 'but' in one sentence. one is enough.
but the character, who has miserably failed one after another,
Description: 'who' can not refer to 'character'.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 361 350
No. of Characters: 1928 1500
No. of Different Words: 249 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.359 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.341 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.982 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 149 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 123 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 89 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 63 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.769 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.693 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.692 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.289 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.522 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.018 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... any actions we carry out in our lives, i believe that involvements are the param...
^
Line 1, column 327, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ss firstly the repercussion of genes on humans behaviour and secondly, the effect of e...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 514, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...l elements may diminish some aspects of ones personality. For example, even though a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 728, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...to retake the assessment at least for a period of time. This explains why inborn traits are no...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 118, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...al than genetic systems and personally, i think more studies ought to be conducte...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, while, apart from, at least, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, in the second place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1982.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49030470914 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0701494733 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.678670360111 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.5771395757 49.4020404114 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.461538462 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7692307692 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.1538461538 7.06120827912 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190137898908 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473696424893 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062723367802 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105208179489 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585584594736 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.97 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.