Do you think the consumer should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example of your own experiences.
In this day and age, beautiful packed items have become common among people from all walks of life all around the world. I am inclined to firmly believe that both consumers and producers should avoid extra packaging.
From a social point of view, overpacked products are indeed bound to high cost, which means it might lead to both environment and pollution. For example, a group of reputable environmentalists, working at a prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study to understand the relationship between production and product as well as consumers. Therefore, this evidence presented thus far support the contention that packaging is positively correlated with not only expensive goods but also pollutants.
In environmental terms, consumption is undoubtedly attributable to responsibility, in that it would lead to producers, customers, and shoppers. A well-known example of such attributions is a shopping mall, which is cause for concern since it had been mistaken in taking sales for granted. Had it protected the planet in advance, it might have had the opportunity to save lives. Thus, buyers could play a significant role in avoiding over packed products.
In conclusion, both individuals and producers should buy over packed products to preserve the planet and low costs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-21 | gobindh Singh | 72 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | manraj123 | 11 | view |
| 2018-04-08 | omer.cinpir | 77 | view |
| 2018-03-25 | Benzi | 85 | view |
| 2018-03-14 | Danielee Goncalves | 77 | view |
- In a war of ideas it is people who get killed Does a common man suffer from a group s ideology Express your opinion and support the same with reasons and examples 67
- Extreme sports like skiing, rafting, diving should be banned. Agree or disagree? 85
- "More information available online so library books are useless." Agree or disagree with the statement? 88
- Do you think driving and voting for youngsters below 25-year-old is necessary 88
- International travel and tourism makes people prejudiced rather than broad-minded. What are its causes and what measures can be taken to solve this problem? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1097.0 1207.87684729 91% => OK
No of words: 201.0 242.827586207 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45771144279 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21161138094 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 139.433497537 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686567164179 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 379.143842365 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8714371053 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.7 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206364086061 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745219793924 0.0925447433944 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719246845364 0.071462118173 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121671701722 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430847010148 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 55.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.