Do you think the consumers should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.
The importance of products packaging which was always debatable has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of avoiding extra packaging of products has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on the environment in recent years. It can be said that consumers should avoid over packed products, however, some people concern that it is producers responsibility to avoid extra packaging of products. This essay will elaborate how product buyers and product sellers can work in collaboration and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why over packed products should be avoided by consumers, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that over packing puts our environment in danger. Example for instance, plastic waste deposits in the ocean, which affects marine life, chemical release from non-degradable products can harm the planet and its inhabitants. Consumers avoiding over packed products, therefore can play a vital role in protecting our environment.
Nevertheless, some people adopt on opposite view and tend to believe that producers should avoid extra packaging of products are also significant as there are innumerable reasons for that, but the most prominent one lies in the fact that pollution caused by industries. Example as an illustration, pollution caused by industrial waste, such as carbon monoxide emissions release in the atmosphere causing adverse climatic changes. Thus, producers extra packaging of products can effect climatic conditions.
Approaches to cope with problems of over packaging of products are numerous, but the most effective one is that consumers and produces collective taking steps to take responsibility for the betterment of the environment, which is not impractical and unattainable, but comprehensible and feasible. For what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that consumers avoiding over packed products is prominent, but producers over packing products should not be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-21 | gobindh Singh | 72 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | manraj123 | 11 | view |
| 2018-04-08 | omer.cinpir | 77 | view |
| 2018-03-25 | Benzi | 85 | view |
| 2018-03-14 | Danielee Goncalves | 77 | view |
- What are the benefits of living in big cities, as opposed to rural areas? What are the problems of rural areas and how can they be solved? 80
- It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice. to what extent do you agree or disagree? 80
- More and more wild animals are on the verge of extinction and others are on the endangered list. What are the reasons for this? What can be done to solve this problem? 77
- Should jobs be reserved for woman, do your agree or disagree? 80
- Global climate change. who should take responsibility to avoid climate change from government, corporate and individual discuss. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...umers should avoid over packed products, however, some people concern that it is ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 307.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63843648208 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0637737634 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537459283388 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 536.4 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.931034482759 537% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.2514502285 50.4703680194 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.25 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5833333333 20.9669160288 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394692173644 0.242375264174 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157913581693 0.0925447433944 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799977388049 0.071462118173 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256308672566 0.151781067708 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523849433728 0.0609392437508 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.