Nowadays people buy a lot of things even though they don’t really need them. Why it is happening. Is it a positive or negative trend?
Nowadays, trend of shopping is gaining ground in this modern era. Presently, some masses ponder that unnecessary shopping is getting prevalence all across the society. Here, I would like to throw lights on the causes and its positive as well as negative impact on the society.
There are multifarious points to specify its reasons. To begin with, advertisements are playing crucial role to tempt people towards new stuffs. To illustrate, adverts not only during breaks in TV programs but also through banners can manipulate people’s mind to crave for such things. Thus, advertising could dominate in all aspects to lead people interested to purchase dispensable items. Moreover, to be in top of the race of fashion youngsters spends lavishly over branded clothes and other fashionable items without considering their needs and requirements.
There are manifold benefits of this trend. Firstly, shopping helps to uplift the living standard of people by purchasing latest and exclusive stuff. To elaborate, consumers can buy electronic gadgets, kitchen items, clothes same as other daily requirement utensils and so on. Hence, people can fulfill their demands easily through purchasing on daily basis. Finally, business of commercial sector is mushrooming under the influence of unnecessary shopping.
On the contrary, shopping addiction is leading to the issues of rubbish these days. To embark, people tend to buy more and more new stuff and it waste lots of money that they can contribute to some other valuable things. Thus, being shopaholic is a rising concern for the society.
To recapitulate, shopping has become part and parcel of everyone life. Indeed excess of everything is bad so one should limit their expenditure and financial budget.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-11-14 | Neha mehta | 59 | view |
- Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for and allow their children to do whatever they want Is this a good way to raise children What consequence could this style of parenting have children as they get older 78
- Topic: Some people believe that mature employees are beneficial to a company. Others think that younger employees contribute more and hence are more beneficial to a company. Discuss both views with your own perception. 89
- Many people believe that women make better parents than men and that is why they have greater role in raising children in most societies. Others claim that men are just as good as women at parenting. Discuss your views. 73
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots why do you think it is happening Is it negative or positive development 84
- Some people support the development of factory farming and the science creation of fruits and vegetables in agriculture, but others oppose to these development. Discuss both views. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'wastes'?
Suggestion: wastes
...d to buy more and more new stuff and it waste lots of money that they can contribute ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 72, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...ecome part and parcel of everyone life. Indeed excess of everything is bad so one shou...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, as well as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42545454545 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80088297766 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669090909091 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5307546792 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8888888889 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2777777778 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38888888889 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125903804131 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0313797753961 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0320804899753 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0586521184796 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304622198643 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.62 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.