In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? Give your reasons.
Recently, students assessment has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question, “is it advantageous or not?” Whereas it is a widely held view that written examinations are highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the psychological standpoint, formal assessments are bound up inextricably with educational policies, which means they lead to both high levels of stress and anxiety. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between performance appraisal and intellectual stimulation as well as an exponential increase in goal achievements. Their academic criticism was impressive. Researchers, nevertheless, paid heed to qualifications, cheatings, and scores alike. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far support the contention that the likelihood of confidence is correlated positively with not only irreversible changes but also adverse outcomes.
Within the realm of education science, without the slightest doubt, efficient training systems attribute to alternative hypotheses in that it would come down to academics, pupils, and high-tech institutions. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. A salient example of such attribution is non-governmental organizations, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take performance appraisal improvements for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint evaluation problems. Likewise, hardly had they confine their attention to exam results, good grades, and even teachers. It is, hence, reasonable to infer the pivotal role of systematic changes.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that written examinations are of high importance. However, we perceive that with the benefit of hindsight, the more we research, the further we discover. Meanwhile, as a feasible solution, the local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-22 | njerime | 77 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | kooshandehfar | 22 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | kooshandehfar | 11 | view |
| 2019-01-25 | armimogh | 85 | view |
| 2019-01-25 | armimogh | 85 | view |
- Parents are responsible for their children s behavior To what extent do you agree or disagree 97
- Mass media influence on people 88
- Euthanasia 11
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? 85
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, thus, well, whereas, while, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1930.0 1207.87684729 160% => OK
No of words: 319.0 242.827586207 131% => OK
Chars per words: 6.05015673981 5.00649968141 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48213075837 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 139.433497537 163% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.711598746082 0.580463131201 123% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 379.143842365 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.5057471645 50.4703680194 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.666666667 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0621294257413 0.242375264174 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0151869738164 0.0925447433944 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0242654863464 0.071462118173 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0375675375829 0.151781067708 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221156266119 0.0609392437508 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.81 11.5310837438 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.66 8.32886699507 140% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 55.0591133005 256% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 22.5 9.94827586207 226% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.