In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory.Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting?
The substantial influences of compulsory voting have sparked a controversy amongst the public all around the world. Although specific argument claimed that compulsory voting is against the human right, a group of intellectuals debate otherwise and hold opponent's view. I am highly inclined to believe that forced voting could have many benefits for a society. The agenda of this article is to discuss both sides of the mandatory choosing system, which verifies how it impacts a country and will reach a legitimate conclusion.
At the outset, country leaders, president, as well as senators advocate each nation around the globe and must have the support of the highest majority of the people. By legalizing mandate-voting, we help our communities to follow and review election campaign and candidate plan, which affect directly our future. For instance, in Australia, election news covers 35% of the total headlines in a month prior due date. So compulsory selections could affect United Nations, democratic societies, parliaments, Senates, as well as the house of representatives.
Required-voting system gives an evil hand support for right-wing and nationalist groups to stand one step higher than left-wing and liberal political party candidates. Based on recent research, conducted by a group of profound political activists in a renowned university, in an obligatory pulling, left-wing and labor party candidates could have 20% less chance than extremist and Neo-Nazism candidates to win the election. Therefore, the effects of a compulsory pulling on political parties in a democratic social system must be highly considered by people.
To recapitulate, while there are several divergent opinions on both sides, my sentiment is that the benefits of an obligatory voting system take more credence that its drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jenifer | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Daniel Torres | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | smb.arami | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | Daniel Torres | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | Daniel Torres | 77 | view |
- Euthanasia Is No Longer Acceptable In The Modern Society. Discuss 80
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 77
- Nowadays, the mass media including TV, radio and newspaper have become the essential part of our lives. What is your opinion? 85
- Are the cars damaging the environment? Should the number of cars be restricted to one for one family? Give your views and support your views with appropriate examples 67
- Euthanasia is no longer acceptable in the modern society. Discuss the solutions to accept this fact. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54285714286 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06011204277 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635714285714 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1325769785 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.333333333 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.25397266985 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160924522019 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059931029394 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623356958807 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936008974628 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711601125407 0.0609392437508 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.