Recent statics revealed that, road accidents claimed most of the life than any epidemics or natural disasters. About two third of these accidents are due to careless driving or manmade errors. In order to tackle this down, some people believe that strict punishments should be given to the traffic offenders. While others think that there are other methods to reduce road accidents.
Strict rules and regulations are always plays a crucial role in controlling these kind of incidents. In majority of the countries traffic rules are not that much strict. Every country has their own road safely rules, many of them are failed to implement it correctly or strictly. As result, people are not taking these so called restrictions seriously because they know that thy can get away with some penalties even if they do some serious violations. If a country has an effective system to keep on eye on traffic violations, then the road accidents will automatically reduce. For instance, United Arab Emirates is one of the very few nations following this strategy. They have very strict laws regarding traffic violations and they have a perfect system to monitor this. There is no wonder why this small country is recorded for least number of accidents.
On the contrary, some people argue that instead of strict rules there are other alternatives to control this scenario. According to them, educating people about importance of obeying traffic rules makes significant difference. Drivers are disobeying the rules not just because of absence of strict policies, it is rather due to the unawareness of it's dangers and consequences. Furthermore, the authorities can tighten the driving test criteria, so that they can ensure that only best are allowed to drive a vehicle. Moreover, governments should increase the lower age limit restriction for getting the license. This way, they can ensure that only matured person is placed behind the wheels.
To recapitulate, in my opinion the law enforcements should implement a combination of both of these strategies. Strict rules followed by awareness programs defiantly make a gradual difference in the present day scenario.
- Today’s food travels thousands of miles before it reaches customers. Why is this? Is this a positive or negative trend? 84
- Government spending should only be focused on public services and it is a waste of money to spend on arts eg painting or music to what extent do you agree or disagree 77
- The line graph below shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents. The table below gives information on the country of origin where the visitors came from. 78
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities. 73
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ould be given to the traffic offenders. While others think that there are other metho...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ays plays a crucial role in controlling these kind of incidents. In majority of the countr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, then, third, while, for instance, kind of, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21387283237 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7501393414 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598265895954 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.5321366125 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.2 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235173686119 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672469035697 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564953493052 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14124100379 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656433412827 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.