The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003.
The two pie charts present information about the comparison in energy generation from various sources, including oil, natural gas, coal, nuclear, hydro and other renewable sources, in a country in 1985 and 2003.
Overall, the use of some sources to produce energy increased with time, whereas the others decreased. While the traditional energy sources such as oil and nuclear went down, the consumption of coal and other renewable sources experienced an increase.
It can be seen from the pie charts that oil was the main sourced for energy production, despite its usage dramatically dropped from 52% in 1985 to 39% in 2003. Whereas, the percentage of natural gas rose from 13% to 23% over the given period. Likewise, consuming in coal went through a period of significant increase from 8% to 22%, exceeding the figure in nuclear, which had only 8%.
In comparison with the amount energy produced was accounted for 4% in the initial year, remaining stable till 2003. Over the given eighteen- year period, the proportion of energy produced from other renewable source increased from 1% to 4%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-11 | MattNewhouse95 | view | |
| 2019-05-16 | mandeep singh gomer | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-18 | chuc linh | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-11 | MattNewhouse95 | view | |
| 2023-02-18 | chuc linh | 78 | view |
- The line graph shows the size of the global population from 1400 to 2000, and the pie charts show the global population by region in 1900 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems to increase the costs of fuels. Do you agree or disagree? 11
- The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems to increase the costs of fuels. Do you agree or disagree?? 11
- Many students have to study subjects which they do not like. Some people think this is a complete waste of time. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- The bar chart shows the number of visitors to three London Museums between 2007 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ropped from 52% in 1985 to 39% in 2003. Whereas, the percentage of natural gas rose fro...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...e in nuclear, which had only 8%. In comparison with the amount energy produced was acc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, so, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11666666667 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62525131072 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.153187952 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.125 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262834552486 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117887008897 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734277304351 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167269626559 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589471817378 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.