The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The mentioned three pie charts reveal the information about the budget spent by a particular UK school in different categories in three different years: 1981, 1991, and 2001.
Overall, the teacher’s salaries were dominant among the other categories while insurance had the lowest proportion of budgets allocated.
It is evident that teacher salaries had accounted the rate of 40%, 50% and 45% in the year 1981, 1991 and 2001 respectively which was the highest proportion in all the years. Likewise, other workers salaries saw a rate of 28% in 1981, 22% in 1991 and just 15% in 2001. Moreover, resources like books had encountered a fluctuating trend since it was 15% in 1981, 20% in 1991, and 9% in 2001.
Looking in more details, we can see that furniture and equipment had also shown ups and down trend. It was slightly decreased from 15 % to 5 % in the year 1991, but it was drastically increased to 23% in 2001. However, insurance experienced the percentage of steadily lower than 10% in all the year. In fact, it was 10% which was highest in the year 2001.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-11 | wardiati | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | eurus0124 | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | eurus0124 | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | Mostafa Nabil | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | Mostafa Nabil | 73 | view |
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think it is better to work for different organisations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 56
- Compare the advantages and disadvantages of three of the following as media for communicating information. State which three you consider the most effective.ComicBooksRadioTelevisionFilmTheaterGive reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples 61
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 69
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 81
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 62
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, look, moreover, so, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82702702703 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73618131884 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578378378378 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5374709909 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2222222222 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171063241735 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724751346852 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893344254261 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116297586792 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116957553324 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.