Some people thinks that law changes human behavior. Discuss this and give your opinion.
The importance of law in human life, which has always been debated, has now become more controversial. It can be agreed that law defiantly change human behavior towards breaking law, but it has some drawbacks as well. This essay will elaborate both pros and cons of the impact of law on human behavior and lead to a logical conclusion.
Firstly, there are numerous reasons why law affects human behavior but the most conspicuous one lies on the fact that people stop breaking lows. It is also proving that crime rate of city will go down. For instance, number of laws are introduced on road to prevent accident which means people must change their behavior and thinking towards new laws. Those new rules are also introduced with high penalties. Thus, high penalties and increasing laws are changing human behavior.
On the contrary, some people adopt opposing view that law cannot change human behavior. There are some people who never affected by any kind of change. An illustration, old age people don’t worry about laws when they drive vehicles. In some cases, people don’t want to change themselves. Another example, there are many laws in India, but no one follows most of them because hard to get penalties.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that law can change human behavior although its depend on human nature.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-20 | 3pid | 85 | view |
| 2018-11-01 | baran.bahrani | 88 | view |
| 2018-10-31 | payamesp2 | 80 | view |
| 2018-10-28 | aravinthc | 55 | view |
| 2018-09-13 | Abhinash Jaiswal | 55 | view |
- tourists 77
- travelling is necessary for education 85
- tv 11
- Do you think extreme sports like skiing, water rafting etc. are dangerous and should be prohibited? 77
- Different people are successful in different fields Some people work long hours to get success but others feel that we should spend free time for fun than money Which style closely related to you and explains your opinion 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...avior and lead to a logical conclusion. Firstly, there are numerous reasons why ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, thus, well, for instance, kind of, in some cases, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 1207.87684729 94% => OK
No of words: 228.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98245614035 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45000800873 2.71678728327 90% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609649122807 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 379.143842365 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.079883907 50.4703680194 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.1428571429 104.977214359 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2857142857 20.9669160288 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.455843537332 0.242375264174 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157056264144 0.0925447433944 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103372817115 0.071462118173 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271940621995 0.151781067708 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282161763792 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 12.6369458128 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.1260098522 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.9458128079 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.32886699507 93% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 55.0591133005 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.