In order to be truly employable, the educated person should be able to demonstrate not just knowledge but also the ability to work independently in teams.
How can teamwork best be encouraged and assessed in educational settings?
In modern workplace, one’s employability is linked not only to his display of academic understandings but also to his ability to perform individually while still cooperating with them. For this reasons, various measures should be taken to promote and evaluate teamwork skills in schools.
To begin with, teachers should assign group projects more often on suitable and interesting topics. For instance, students could be asked to team up to look up information and present about bubble milk tea’s positive and negative impacts on our lives in terms of health and finance. In my opinion, while working together to investigate intriguing topics such as above, students will have opportunities to use critical thinking skills to have multidimensional discussions with their team members. However, the drawback here is that some students will slack off and completely rely on their friends’ hard work.
In order to deal with that, teachers may ask each group to keep a study journal, which would be submitted to them periodically. In details, this journal should include updates regarding each member’s findings, of which contents are related to their assignment, on a daily basis. With this tool, teachers should be able to keep track of all the progress being made to give proper encouragement to both responsible individuals and those who are less enthusiastic. In addition, this also allows team members to compare their own contribution with others and encourage them to complete the tasks they are assigned with.
In conclusion, there are several ways to create a steady platform on which student’s teamwork skills may grow, but the effective ones always have to stimulate their interests with genuinely practical tasks and tools that permit timely acts of motivation and self-reflection.
- The plans below show a student room for two students and a student room for one student at an Australian university 72
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 89
- Some believe that people will purchase a product based on their needs and advertising is not needed To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should spend about 20 minutes on this task 84
- Entertainers get paid more than politicians What are the reasons for this Is this a negative or positive development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... while still cooperating with them. For this reasons, various measures should be tak...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, look, may, regarding, so, still, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45583038869 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0312090156 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65371024735 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.2175718814 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.363636364 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1818181818 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145691523921 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590495071765 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537709375499 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0843315161074 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508591339643 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.