In many countries children are engaged in different kinds of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong. Others consider it as a valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion?
Nowadays, the crisis of paid-work children has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, which leads to a moot question “whether paid works bring children important work experience and responsibility or not?”. It is a widely held view that preventing vulnerable children from paid-work is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common beliefe that preventing children to work at an early age plays a vital role in the world of cut-throat competition. To put into consideration, I express several reasons why I support this idea. First and foremost is that the majority of children are in charge of fewer value works, such as washing dished or cleaning the house without any worthy experience. Secondly, it can be argued that they are often paid less than an adult, while they work like them. In addition to this information, it should be mentioned that they are unable to achieve enough knowledge and in some cases are exploited by employers. A group of scientists, working at a prestigious university conducted that they usually neglect their lessons and are failed the exam.
However, there is no doubt that paid-work children provide people with various positive points. It should be taken into account that working at an early age gives children a sense of self-confidence and independence. Moreover, it is quite clear that they can reinforce social and cognitive skills and empower their interaction with people.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that toughen prevention in order to stop working children must be taken into consideration. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
- Right amount of motivation and practice can train better than classroom training. What is your opinion? Provide relevant examples. 80
- Are the cars damaging the environment? Should the number of cars be restricted to one for one family? Give your views and support your views with appropriate examples. 80
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 11
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree?? 88
- Information revolution has changed the way of mass communication and had some negative effects on individual lives as well on society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...crisis of paid-work children has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, in addition, no doubt, such as, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 20.9802955665 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21739130435 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97047962038 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612040133779 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5864939559 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.25397266985 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219675957725 0.242375264174 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744588866428 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515445372447 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132551812643 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489719339228 0.0609392437508 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 77.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.