should long-term job seekers in receipt of government benefits be made to do voluntary work so that they give something back to the community?
Whilst many benefits seekers are undoubtedly genuine, public sympathy often does not extend to the long-term unemployed.There is a feeling that such people in receipt of benefits should give something back to the community.
Making the long-term unemployed do voluntary work would satisfy public opinion and also be of great benefit to those out of work, from both a psychological as well as a practical viewpoint.
Long-term job seekers often lack self-esteem and confidence, which having a job provides. Working as a volunteer would help give them a purpose in life and help them win back their confidence.Also, without a good income or reason to get out. the long-term unemployed often end up staying home most of the time and then feel distanced from society and can be depressed.If they did voluntary work, they would become part of society once more.
From a practical aspect, doing voluntary work could also improve the employment prospect of long-term job seekers. Long-term job seekers have been out of the job market for sufficient time to sometimes make them an unattractive choice for employers. Working as a volunteer would give long-term job seekers recent work experience and make them more employable.
It can be seen that doing voluntary work can benefit the long-term unemployed on many levels. Instead of providing financial support for the long-term unemployed, with no form of payback, the government should instead demand a period of voluntary work in return for benefits. Whilst the idea may not be initially popular, it will benefit everyone in the long-run.
- Should companies which cause pollution be taxed 78
- should long term job seekers in receipt of government benefits be made to do voluntary work so that they give something back to the community 72
- Some people think that money is one of the most essential factors in promoting happiness Do you think people can be happy without much money what other factors contribute towards happiness 95
- some people prefer to play team sports while others prefer to play individual sports Discuss the advantages of each Then indicate which you prefer and why 65
- You recently moved to a new apartment. Write to your friend and say- Why did you move there- Describe the new apartment- Invite him/her to visit you 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
... not extend to the long-term unemployed.There is a feeling that such people in receip...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... out of work, from both a psychological as well as a practical viewpoint. Long-term job...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Also
...and help them win back their confidence.Also, without a good income or reason to get...
^^^^
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...out a good income or reason to get out. the long-term unemployed often end up stayi...
^^^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
...anced from society and can be depressed.If they did voluntary work, they would bec...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23046875 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90189683639 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5546875 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3942857695 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.727272727 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.476189202841 0.244688304435 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188625365581 0.084324248473 224% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634050974876 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267573002475 0.151304729494 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310742259352 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.