Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Traffic has become a major concern in some countries and the government has already made regulations to control the growing number of vehicles and the pollution it has brought. Oil price hike is deemed to be the most effective control measure which I disagree for it will just make the people’s lives more difficult.
Petrol is not just needed for public transports, as well as shipping of goods. If the oil price is high, businessmen will increase the prices of their market products to retain returns of investment. Moreover, the rise in product prices will increase household expenses, allowing more people to succumb in poverty since there is low income, yet, prices of their basic needs became expensive.
The probability of a decrease in the number of vehicles is very low. Even if the oil price goes up, people will still continue using vehicles especially those whose main source of income comes from sending passengers to any destinations. Drivers will just increase the minimum fare which again will impact on the passengers. If this is the case, crime rates will inflate.
In the end, adding the price on petrol is not the most appropriate method to reduce traffic and pollution. I suggest that the government should focus more on the employment aspect of the people so that, when there are enough employed individuals, complemented by 4 P’s which is a program to help the poorest people in society, they can upgrade to building railways similar to Singapore to slowly minimize the usage of vehicles and later on completely end it, as well as to pollution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | julieehung | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | ghikar | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows geothermal energy is used to produce electricity. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- How to make oneself study 56
- In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.Discuss both these views and give your own o 56
- Here and more people are relying on the private car at their major meant of transportation. Describe some of the problems over-reliance on cars can cause, and suggest at least one possible solution. 78
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries. Do you agree or disagree? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, still, well, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97358490566 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68057368078 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592452830189 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.9367729284 49.4020404114 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.818181818 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109065163665 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443198932381 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038198774334 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0692126237345 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424236813584 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.