It is often said that the subjects taught in schools are too academic in orientation and that it would be more useful for children to learn about practical matters such as home management, work and interpersonal skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There are many essential skill that students need to prepare for their future life. It is highly debatable issue whether soft skills are vital in vocational training at school instead of academic subjects. I agree that school add more practical lessons but still teach basis knowledge. Scientific and majoring training is up to students.
First, it is obvious that practical lessons are well-prepared for students' future career. After graduating, almost all academic knowledge such as poem or some types of math will be unhelpful in their job. Instead, we need interpersonal methods or management skills to get promotion. The other advantage of practical lessons is that it is more flexible for students to enrich knowledge and apply them immediately after that. Therefore,the memory consolidation will have no difficulty in admitting and keeping this lessons for a long time.
Second, it is undeniable that education plays a significant role in the study of students. However academic topics sometimes are too monotonous and hard for them because there is a load of compulsory subjects at school. Therefore, school should only have responsibility for teaching primary knowledge. If students have desire to specialise in some fields, school will supply master courses to them.
Although many people still claim that parents have obligations for their children' soft skills, i believe that children nowadays spend almost time at school with their teachers rather than families. Therefore, it is much undemanding for teachers to teach them about practical skills.
Due to these reasons, i advocate to supplement practical lessons at school, however, the basic knowledge still must be taught.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-07 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-10 | lennie.butera | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-03 | Lyly241096 | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Châu Cương Chí | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | Luna Qian | 73 | view |
- It is often said that the subjects taught in schools are too academic in orientation and that it would be more useful for children to learn about practical matters such as home management, work and interpersonal skills. To what extent do you agree or disa 61
- It is often said that the subjects taught in schools are too academic in orientation and that it would be more useful for children to learn about practical matters such as home management work and interpersonal skills To what extent do you agree or disagr 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...y them immediately after that. Therefore,the memory consolidation will have no diffi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 509, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... no difficulty in admitting and keeping this lessons for a long time. Second, it ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are sometimes
...dy of students. However academic topics sometimes are too monotonous and hard for them becaus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 96, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...gations for their children soft skills, i believe that children nowadays spend al...
^
Line 8, column 23, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...tical skills. Due to these reasons, i advocate to supplement practical lesson...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, still, therefore, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46007604563 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82537906243 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600760456274 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0637995964 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.75 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4375 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203876974684 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651892758441 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441400380857 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113948062798 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0130379238246 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.