The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table provides changes in the amount of yearly mobile sales in millions of five well-known brands from 2006 to 2012.
The most notable feature was that Nokia maintained its popularity to the most throughout of the period with its peak at 2008 when 475 millions mobile phones were sold out. In contrast, the sale of Motorola handsets witnessed a remarkably decreasing pattern over the period despite their second highest sales in the first two years. A similar trend took place in the Ericsson brand except its initial rise to 102 millions in 2007. Moreover, Ericsson had the lowest deman...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-19 | nazanink1 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Ieltslearner | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-19 | nazanink1 | 67 | view |
| 2018-11-13 | mifas meleraroth | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | Artejas | 89 | view |
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give re 84
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 97
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in differnt countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The table provides changes in the amount...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, second, so, well, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85572139303 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30381029873 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611940298507 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3779276287 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168070169142 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694925156036 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396244409147 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100608672701 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02397982129 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.