Some people argue that governments should stop supporting the professional sporting events and cultural programs, and instead support schools from where students can take up sports and arts
Every society in general, and every nation in particular has a definite sense and sentiments of sporting and cultural preferences. The members of such society or country propagate these tilts through their active interest in the connected events.
First of all, it is true that the governments spend enormous amounts of money on these events. Interestingly, this spending is justified because these events not only entertain audience they also generate abundance income. If a country is least interested in organization of a global sporting event, it can significantly diminish its image before the world.
For example, such events is the Oktoberfest celebrated in Munich city of Bavarian Germany. It is a sixteen to eighteen days long affair and attracts participants in excess of five million from across the globe. After Oktoberfest event, Germany’s tourism industry has boosted beyond limits. Furthermore, sporting and cultural events encourage healthy competition between the members of a society. As a result, it prevents various social evil’s appearances that may otherwise gnaw at the roots of the civilization.
On the other hand, there is some truth in the argument that governments should support schools so that children can polish their sports and arts skills from an early age. However, there is an argument that authorities only look after sports and culture up to schools levels. In like manner it may interrupt studies and students will divert towards fun and activities rather than focus on their syllabus.
To conclude, it can safely be deduced that spending considerable sum of money on sports and cultural events not only nourishes healthy thinking, but also promotes the soft image of the society worldwide. It would rather not to be waste of thought to support sports and arts on school level, since they hold their country's future success.
To conclude, it can safely be deduced that spending considerable sum of money on sports and cultural events not only nourishes healthy thinking, but also promotes the soft image of the society worldwide. It would rather not to be waste of thought to support sports and arts on school level, since they hold their country's future success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-02 | MariaOvais | 84 | view |
| 2018-03-02 | MariaOvais | 56 | view |
| 2018-03-02 | MariaOvais | 61 | view |
| 2018-03-02 | MariaOvais | 67 | view |
| 2018-03-02 | MariaOvais | 67 | view |
- Some people argue that governments should stop supporting the professional sporting events and cultural programs, and instead support schools from where students can take up sports and arts 56
- Some people argue that governments should stop supporting the professional sporting events and cultural programs, and instead support schools from where students can take up sports and arts 67
- Some people argue that governments should stop supporting the professional sporting events and cultural programs, and instead support schools from where students can take up sports and arts 84
- Some people argue that governments should stop supporting the professional sporting events and cultural programs, and instead support schools from where students can take up sports and arts 84
- Some people argue that governments should stop supporting the professional sporting events and cultural programs, and instead support schools from where students can take up sports and arts 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, for example, in general, in particular, as a result, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1888.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.765846892 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502824858757 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5802504159 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.058823529 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8235294118 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11764705882 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297892175054 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091663051315 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799780979753 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155477911342 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078951859996 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.