As the world is rapidly developing in this era of ever evolving technology, most inhabitants in the developed nations rely on private cars to work or to go school on a regular basis. The situation is not much different in the developing countries either. This phenomenon definitely has some detrimental effects on human’s life quality, which requires governments to implement a policy of encouraging people to depend on public transport. I totally agree with this practice based on the impracticability it offers.
It is justifiable for the governments to limit the use of private cars since the development of private cars would only pose alarming threats to society. The most hazard consequence is that when more and more cars hit the roads, there would be an increase in vehicular pollution. The quality of air in cities is already horrible. The growth in the number of cars will make the situation even worse. It can even cause climate change, which means it cause drastic changes in weather pattern across the world. What’s more, when the air quality of air decreases, there is an increase in the incidences of respiratory diseases. Moreover, an increase in the number of cars is also parallel to more accidents. It is obvious that juries and mortalities related to human’s careless car driving behaviors have accounted for the largest proportion of death tolls on the roads in the current world. Countless innocent lives are lost in accidents every day.
In addition, the practice of local government adopting new policies that are focused on encouraging people to rely on the public transport system could deter the problem from further exacerbated. Take England for example, it is easy to commute on public vehicles such as buses, trains and trams as the government has successfully boosted the demand of using public transports by allocating more funding to upgrade their quality and reliability. This effort has resulted in a steady and substantial decrease in private vehicle volume and exhaust fume discharge amount in this country.
In conclusion, based on the aforementioned discussions, one may conclude that it is necessary and important for the governing body to reduce the use of private cars and make public transport vehicles more reliable. I completely believe that a high- quality public transport system is the key to any traffic problem, which should be invested drastically.
- Does modern technology make life more convenient or was life better when technology was simple? 84
- Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent on each other, while others think that people have become more independent. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Modern technology, such as personal computers and the Internet, have made it possible for many people to do their work from home at least part of the time instead of going to an office everyday.What are some of the advantages and disadvantages of this sol 84
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.In some countries, governments are encouraging people to use their cars less and to take public transport instead. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and i 73
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 330, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...y of air in cities is already horrible. The growth in the number of cars will make ...
^^^
Line 2, column 448, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
...en cause climate change, which means it cause drastic changes in weather pattern acro...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, moreover, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2030.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20512820513 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93201063957 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551282051282 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9808397471 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.777777778 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27777777778 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219256356065 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594489005254 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546411800194 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141971713833 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493575507813 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.