Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Scandals are indeed a great thing. They are the seed of change in society. Society is so busy going after its business that it has no time to pay attention to some of the issues or problems it faces. However, when these issues result in scandals, the attention of the public is caught, inspiring public interest into the situation. This encourages an enlightment on the issue and brings about good public discourse and contribution in addressing such issues. It also puts pressure on government and policy makers and society at large to make changes which may not happen under normal circumstances.
When the radios and TV come flashing with breaking news of allegations of corruption and misconduct in government, the public pays attention. Such scandals creates public awareness on the inner world of government which the public has no knowledge of. Abuse of tax payer’s money, and human rights, which may have been unknown to the public are brought to light. This sparks public interest on these issues which causes people to seek more knowledge or information regarding the issues in question. During this course, society has become more enlightened on its affairs. In fact scandals is the means by which society becomes aware of the beaucracies and protocols that characterize its governance. Americans would not know about the Guatanamo Bay if their was no scandal about the alleged abuses practiced used at such detention camps. Nor would they have known of the use of drones but for the scandals generated by drone attacks. Scandals are the only way of getting public interested in the boring details of governance and society. With a better informed public, society is in a better position to address such issues and make right decisions.
It is true that scandals distort the nature of issues. With media “sound bites,” situations are sometimes exaggerated. But the beauty of scandals is that it generates public debate and discourse on issues. Though situations maybe exaggerated, when the public interest is caught, people investigate and make research into these situations and can make truth out of the noise and exaggerations of the media. With a diverse media, each taking different sides on a situation, the public is better enlightened on situations even though elements of falsehood may still persist.
However,scandals at times digress the attention of the public from other important issue. Scandals about actors and musicians gather public attention shielding interest from other pertinent issue that society ought to address. The death or murder trial of a hip hop artist may unfortunately overshadow the attention to humanitarian disasters, like a hurricane in some part of the country.
- Evidence suggests that academic honor codes which call for students to agree not to cheat in their academic endeavors and to notify a faculty member if they suspect that others have cheated are far more successful than are other methods at deterring cheat 88
- Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.Write a response in which you dis 90
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaint 73
- The following is a letter to the editor of an environmental magazine."Two studies of amphibians in Xanadu National Park confirm a significant decline in the numbers of amphibians. In 1975 there were seven species of amphibians in the park, and there were 90
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you t 90
Comments
Wow. Thank you. My first try.
Wow. Thank you. My first try. How do I improve my essay better and thanks I made correction of the spelling and wrong word use.
Your language is great. You
Your language is great. You may organize the content better like this:
para 1: introduction. my choice: A or B. agree or disagree
para 2: reason 1
para 3: reason 2
para 4: reason 3 (optional)
para 5: conclusion
You may read essays by top users:
http://www.testbig.com/users/sauvikb
http://www.testbig.com/users/ronaldo
http://www.testbig.com/users/computergem
http://www.testbig.com/users/okoronkwoac
http://www.testbig.com/users/rats21
and more:
http://www.testbig.com/essay-categories/gmatgre
Let us know if you have more questions.
Sentence: Americans would not know about the Guatanamo Bay if their was no scandal about the alleged abuses practiced used at such detention camps.
Description: The tag a determiner, possessive is not usually followed by was
Suggestion: Refer to their and was
Sentence: In fact scandals is the means by which society becomes aware of the beaucracies and protocols that characterize its governance.
Error: beaucracies Suggestion: No alternate word
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 24 15
No. of Words: 440 350
No. of Characters: 2228 1500
No. of Different Words: 227 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.58 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.064 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.649 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 173 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 115 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 86 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 62 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.333 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.236 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.542 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.303 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.445 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.074 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5