If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which subject will you choose?
Recently, the phenomenon of climate change and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of bringing polluting in our atmosphere into halt is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the studying of global warming as a subject of climate change can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, changing the weather patterns can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the getting information about global warming, as well as greenhouse gases, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influences of acid rain on the marine eco-system. Thus, beneficial ramifications by both emission of toxic gases and rising the atmosphere temperature can be seen.
Within the realm of the destruction of the ozone layer, climate change might increase the consequences of a wide variety of incurable diseases. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the industrialization would relate to this reality that the demerits of fossil fuels pertain to the urbanization. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of melting ice cabs is correlated negatively with a rise in sea levels. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of renewable source of energy.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the drawbacks of climate change far outweigh its benefits. Not only do the advantages of using public transport systems prove the significance of imposing stricter legislation, but also pinpoint the responsibility of both government and individuals as practical implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-03 | viviana | 55 | view |
| 2019-01-29 | javanbakhttt@yahoo.com | 88 | view |
| 2019-01-29 | javanbakhttt@yahoo.com | 85 | view |
| 2018-09-28 | pbdarab | 88 | view |
| 2018-09-28 | pbdarab | 85 | view |
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? What are the reasons for that? 88
- Are the cars damaging the environment? Should the number of cars be restricted to one for one family? Give your views and support your views with appropriate examples. 85
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? What are the reasons for that? 77
- With all the problems in the world today, some people think that spending money on space exploration is a complete waste. The money can be better spent on other causes. What is your opinion? 89
- Environmental pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 376, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... individuals as practical implications.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 301.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51162790698 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24984536651 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 139.433497537 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647840531561 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.9225129572 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.25 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0833333333 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0829487181802 0.242375264174 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0271447452007 0.0925447433944 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409948188146 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.045002370669 0.151781067708 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344159521443 0.0609392437508 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.96 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 55.0591133005 211% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.