In recent years some websites have appeared which allow students to grade their teachers. Some people believe that this is a good idea, while others think that these websites give power to the wrong people.
Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
Write between 200 and 300 words.
These days, there is an ongoing debate between people about websites for grading teachers and if it should be viewed as a positive or negative impact to society. While it is possible to claim that these websites misleads the students, my view is that advantages outweigh the disadvantages. In this essay, let me explain my point of view by analysing both sides of the argument.
There are several reasons why, grading teachers through websites is considered to be advantageous to society. One of them is that, it helps teachers to improvise them periodically on seeing reviews from their students. It can also be argued that, it builds their confident level and increase their passion towards teaching. It should also be taken into account that, it brings job satisfaction in them.
Those who argue that, website grading give power to the wrong people have a different view and say that it can actually be a bad thing. Firstly it is claimed that, this portal may initiate negative impacts on the teacher- student relationship. Firstly, it is claimed that website reviews about teachers can be used to take self revenge. Then, there are concerns about students view on teachers and their respect towards them may decline.
While there are strong arguments on both sides of the case, my personal opinion is that website grading is actually a good thing. I would strongly recommend that students should be allowed to give their genuine comments on teachers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-04 | anshraz123 | 72 | view |
| 2019-01-10 | Agustinaac | 77 | view |
| 2018-10-27 | mirzaasif88 | 55 | view |
| 2018-05-27 | jyotikumari042 | 65 | view |
| 2018-04-04 | Tharini Anandan | 72 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 64, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...arguments on both sides of the case, my personal opinion is that website grading is actually a g...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, firstly, if, may, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 40.0 20.9802955665 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1231.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0658436214 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57548736996 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 4.6157635468 260% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.4130966948 50.4703680194 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.6923076923 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6923076923 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 7.25397266985 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189056903483 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734326288565 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494709238361 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127578077464 0.151781067708 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431075499781 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.1260098522 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.