Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth and resources among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizen themselves?
Use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and with relevant evidence.
Nowadays, the distribution of wealth between countries is unfair. Some people believe that rich nations should be helped to poverty-stricken nations to improve infrastructures. Oppositely, other people think that it's the responsibility of local governments to take care of their citizens.
It is worth considering people assist to each other because of humanities. They think that their duty to help other countries who are suffering from famine, drought, war or disease. For example, in Africa, many children suffer from malnutrition because of lack resources that cause high rates of death, disability, and dangerous illness like AIDS annually. The further reason why many nations aid to poorer one is that poorer nations change their conditions and don't need more funding, then they can help themselves, other countries and next generation. It happens when the wealthy countries share their knowledge and technology among the undeveloped nations.
On the contrary, other people argue about that must be nations independence and make their country because aid cause people lazy, kill their creativity and they lose their confidence and can't trust their abilities. The other reasons are the most poverty country have corrupt government or can't use donated money for good programs. Therefore, alternative ways can consider like opening up trade barriers or investment in applied projects.
In general, we are human beside of religious, races or languages. We need to help each other to save lives, save moral and save the world. Also, it's true the support of a nation should be reasonable. Nor be a lot to make a country dependent on others or was not a little that poor nations be in difficulty about basic needs.
- The table below shows the consumer durables telephone refrigerator etc owned in Britain from 1972 to 1983 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 69
- "Prevention is better than cure." Out of a country's health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...es. Oppositely, other people think that its the responsibility of local governments...
^^^
Line 2, column 462, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...rer nations change their conditions and dont need more funding, then they can help t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 188, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...vity and they lose their confidence and cant trust their abilities. The other reason...
^^^^
Line 4, column 290, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...erty country have corrupt government or cant use donated money for good programs. Th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, therefore, for example, in general, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29197080292 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82398750514 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602189781022 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9925597848 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06666666667 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275263309377 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861893363108 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795933896666 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172620644494 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037013371244 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.