Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences.?
Recently, the phenomenon of advertising at school by sponsors and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of introducing materials by advertisement is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that funding on the advertisement at schools can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, placing advertisements at school can provide the society with some noticeable effects which rooted in the fact that merits of introducing healthy foods, as well as educational products, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of advertisement on students’ intellectual skills to promote their public awareness. Thus beneficial ramification of both advertising campaign and advertising agent can apparently bound up.
Within the realm of advertising space, placing the advertisement at school might increase the consequences of distracting from the education. Moreover, fundamental aspects of misleading advertisement would relate to this reality that the demerits of tempting students to eat junk foods pertain to advertising agents. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of using schools as a propaganda tool is correlated negatively with advertising management.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of placing the advertisement at school outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of advertising modern educational devices prove the significance of advertising companies, but also pinpoint practical implications.
s.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-08 | angel_isip | 90 | view |
| 2018-04-30 | masi1397 | 88 | view |
| 2018-04-20 | meenutalwar | 77 | view |
| 2018-04-20 | meenutalwar | 77 | view |
| 2018-04-20 | meenutalwar | 77 | view |
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 85
- The environment we live in is in danger. What are the underlying causes? Who is responsible to combat this? 80
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree?? 88
- The 18th century due to industrialization a lot of people migrate to developing countries. This affected lifestyle and increased major problems in developed countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. Choose which position you most agr 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 461, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ills to promote their public awareness. Thus beneficial ramification of both adverti...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.92028985507 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.50194982745 2.71678728327 129% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619565217391 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.4145226961 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.545454545 104.977214359 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175398826934 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072035687097 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0275429620096 0.071462118173 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111194255581 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0127157016117 0.0609392437508 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 53.1260098522 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.35 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.