Today, the advanced science and technology have made great changes to people's life, but artists such as musicians, painters and writers are still highly valued. What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot?
Contemporary artists are esteemed consistently, despite the development of science and technology. Benefits may arts have obtained from them, though, it is evidently that science and technology cannot highlight the far-reaching reasons of life as arts do.
There are various senses that exit merely in artial domain but not in science or technology. The most significant influence of arts concerning the cultivation how to record and express life. Every genre of art is a window to view life, for instance, music teach us to utilize ears to capture the fluctuation of voices in order to comprehend the changing in heart. In addition, considering to the term of reasons arts addressing to people, namely truth, kindness, beauty and love, no distrust will directing to arts whether it provides the same with science. Actually, science arms humans with abilities to survive but not intelligence to live a high-qulity life. Furthermore, taking into account how we grow up, we may have been accompanied by a wide range of arts. Joe HISAISHI, one renowned Japanese musician for example, in whose music and animations the contemporaries of mine had gained, adventurous imagination, inspiration and happiness.
On the other hand, modern techniques are vehicles but not substance. They furnish human beings with knowledge to optimize lives, and with spare time to approach to arts. A new instrument invented, we could appreciate fresh sounds of music, while the rhythms might be the same as before.
In summary, arts afford us inspiration, happiness, treasure art works and valuable culture, all that is nowhere to be found in science and technology. Without artists, alien would our life be to imagination and cultural compositions, and would humans be to spiritual paradise.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-21 | gaurav2492 | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that if the police force carries guns it would encourage a higher level of violence in the society To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people believe that if the police force carries guns, it would encourage a higher level of violence in the society. To what extent do you agree or disagree？ 56
- Today the advanced science and technology have made great changes to people s life but artists such as musicians painters and writers are still highly valued What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot 75
- Some people think most crimes are the result of circumstances like poverty and other social problems. Others believe that they are caused by people who are bad in nature. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Some people believe that if the police force carries guns it would encourage a higher level of violence in the society To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 498, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'direct'
Suggestion: direct
...ness, beauty and love, no distrust will directing to arts whether it provides the same wi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, furthermore, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32384341637 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99037009313 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64768683274 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6010622128 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.857142857 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215417408413 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676927448208 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661074035319 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128558211203 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919457885631 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.