The council of Maple County concerned about the county s becoming overdeveloped is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county But the council is also concerned that such a restriction by limiting the

Essay topics:

The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limiting the supply of new housing, could lead to significant increases in the price of housing in the county. Proponents of the measure note that Chestnut County established a similar measure ten years ago, and its housing prices have increased only modestly since. However, opponents of the measure note that Pine County adopted restrictions on the development of new residential housing fifteen years ago, and its housing prices have since more than doubled. The council currently predicts that the proposed measure, if passed, will result in a significant increase in housing prices in Maple County.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the prediction and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the prediction.

The given argument is presented by the council of the county in the process of deciding whether the Maple county should prevent the development of existing farm land in the county or not. The council is also concerned with the side effects of limiting the development of farmland that, it can affect the price of real estate in county. However, advocators of restriction quote the example of Chestnut county where such restrictions did not have visible effect on land price in ten years, on the other hand rivals of this opinion give the example of Pine County where such measures caused 100% increase in land price in 15 years. So, Council predicts that restriction on developing farmland would result in increased housing price in Maple County. This argument is based merely on comparison of two neighboring counties, however, there are many unanswered questions those should be addressed before any decision.
The earth population is increasing day by day. The cities where few thousand people were living have now millions of residents. Urban and semi-urban areas are over-crowded. To accommodate the increasing population, new housing counties are being developed. So, if new housing schemes are restricted, there would be an increased competition for already built houses and this will ultimately increase the price.
The reasons due to which, Cheshnut and Pine counties had restricted the farmland development are not mentioned. It is possible that people had migrated from Cheshnut county for employment to other cities, then there was no need to construct new buildings. It is also possible that there was not enough supply of basic necessities of life like water, that was making the place not good for living. There is also possibility that some industrial estate has been developed in the area. Noise and pollution of the industry can demotivate the people to purchase house in Cheshnut county. So, there is not a visible increase in price is evident, however, a little increase can be realted to inflation.
The arguer has not discussed the reasons because of those, Pine county had restricted the developmet of residential housings. It is possible that county doesnot want to expand its boundries. It is possible that, by increasing the houses, basic structure of the county can be deformed. There is also possible that the county is already famous for its torist attirations, so by putting restriction on the development of residential housing, the prices went up.
So, before making a decision above stated question should be answered. The ground realities of the Maple county should be addressed. If the Maple county has good scenetic places and all life necesseties are available like Pine county, then there is a good reason of increase in housing prices. On the other hand, if Maple county is laking the basics of life then there may be not increase in housing price would be seen. Without having a good knowledge of Maple county, it would not good to give any perdiction about housing establishment.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-14 Anish Sapkota 66 view
2023-01-02 leonor 68 view
2022-12-19 Junu93 52 view
2022-10-21 zanzendegi 78 view
2022-10-07 nafisasadafprova 74 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user SadiaIqtidar :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this will ultimately increase the price The reasons due to which Cheshnut and Pi...
^^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...ble that there was not enough supply of basic necessities of life like water that was making the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 450, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f residential housing the prices went up So before making a decision above stated...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, then, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.6327345309 178% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 55.5748502994 115% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2477.0 2260.96107784 110% => OK
No of words: 496.0 441.139720559 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9939516129 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63688020098 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 204.123752495 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.417338709677 0.468620217663 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 792.9 705.55239521 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 19.7664670659 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 496.0 22.8473053892 2171% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 57.8364921388 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2477.0 119.503703932 2073% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 496.0 23.324526521 2127% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 51.0 5.70786347227 894% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.20758483034 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366045972527 0.218282227539 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.366045972527 0.0743258471296 492% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0701772020484 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211428911335 0.128457276422 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129470852881 0.0628817314937 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 250.1 14.3799401198 1739% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -431.96 48.3550499002 -893% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.1628742515 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 196.7 12.197005988 1613% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.14 12.5979740519 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 31.68 8.32208582834 381% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 108.0 98.500998004 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 12.3882235529 436% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 200.4 11.1389221557 1799% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 54.0 11.9071856287 454% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 7 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 14 2
No. of Sentences: 25 15
No. of Words: 496 350
No. of Characters: 2471 1500
No. of Different Words: 218 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.719 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.982 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.645 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 191 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 132 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 99 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 59 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.84 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.298 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.52 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.294 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.294 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.092 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5