The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College, a private institution, to the college's governing committee."Recently, there have been discussions about ending Grove College's century-old tr

Essay topics:

The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College, a private institution, to the college's governing committee.

"Recently, there have been discussions about ending Grove College's century-old tradition of all-female education by admitting male students into our programs. At a recent faculty meeting, a majority of faculty members voted in favor of co-education, arguing that it would encourage more students to apply to Grove. However, Grove students, both past and present, are against the idea of coeducation. Eighty percent of the students responding to a survey conducted by the student government wanted the school to remain all female, and over half of the alumnae who answered a separate survey also opposed coeducation. Therefore, we recommend maintaining Grove College's tradition of all-female education. We predict that keeping the college all-female will improve morale among students and convince alumnae to keep supporting the college financially."

Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation

According to the recommendation, Grove college should maintain its century old tradition of all female education. To make this conclusion, the recommnedation assuems the result of survey done with students and alumunai and probable loss of moral among its associates and chance of financial byocott. I found this arugument irrational because it is based on several flawed assumptions.

Firstly, the recommendation assumes the result of survey done among its student about the future modality of the college education. As mentioned earlier, eighty percent of them were in favor of all female education. One importnat point to be noted is student responding to that survey might be responding dishonestly. They might be responding on the basis of ' who cares' attitudes. Their instant respeonse does not represent their true intention, maybe. Thus, before taking survey, the surveyor should have intrepreted the future impact of the survey and want them to respond honestly.

Secondly, the recoomandation stated that over a half of the alumunaies were responding are aganist coeducation. Firstly, the survey does not mention the how manmy of total alumunaies actually respeonded to the survey. This point can cast doubts on the authenticity of the survey. Again, same cases arises that, if they were actually been honest with trhe surveyor? Were they imformed about possible use of the survey? If no, then how can anybody conclude to any point point on the basis of those datas.

Thirdly, the college wants to remain stick to its century old tradition so as to keeping high morale among its associates and keeping on getting financial support from its donnars. How could they know the coeducation subsides them? This the the world of inclusiveness and people tend to be more supportive to the tradition that equally favors both men and women. Also, it would be audacious to declare that coeducation can actulally reduce morale, where is is exacly opposite. Thus, college should think critically about morale and finacial suport.

In the final analysis, the recommendation is based upon the flawed assumption , so it is irrational. To strengthen the argument, the college adminstration should introspect about the credibility of survey done with both students and alumunies and real reasons to keep on morale and financial support.

Votes
Average: 3.2 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-18 jason123 16 view
2019-12-22 orlando23 69 view
2019-11-10 ko_tik 59 view
2019-10-23 orlando23 72 view
2019-10-03 cake-123 69 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Kaurab Gautam :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nai and probable loss of moral among its associates and chance of financial byoco...
^^
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...They might be responding on the basis of who cares attitudes. Their instant respe...
^^
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
...n. Firstly, the survey does not mention the how manmy of total alumunaies actually resp...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 463, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: point
...o, then how can anybody conclude to any point point on the basis of those datas. Thirdl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...main stick to its century old tradition so as to keeping high morale among its associate...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...now the coeducation subsides them? This the the world of inclusiveness and people tend ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...now the coeducation subsides them? This the the world of inclusiveness and people tend ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 455, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: is
...tion can actulally reduce morale, where is is exacly opposite. Thus, college should t...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tion is based upon the flawed assumption , so it is irrational. To strengthen the ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, firstly, honestly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 28.8173652695 101% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 55.5748502994 99% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 16.3942115768 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1968.0 2260.96107784 87% => OK
No of words: 369.0 441.139720559 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86256409397 2.78398813304 103% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 204.123752495 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536585365854 0.468620217663 115% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 705.55239521 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9762075695 57.8364921388 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4545454545 119.503703932 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7727272727 23.324526521 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 5.70786347227 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.25449101796 171% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0927610269318 0.218282227539 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0276103931902 0.0743258471296 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443023701546 0.0701772020484 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0574239288985 0.128457276422 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235836327365 0.0628817314937 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.3799401198 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.5979740519 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 98.500998004 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 12.3882235529 73% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 369 350
No. of Characters: 1911 1500
No. of Different Words: 195 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.383 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.179 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.764 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 146 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 105 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 72 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 52 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.773 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.381 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.455 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.285 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.499 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.067 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5