Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7,000 years ago, and within 3,000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands had become extinct. Yet humans cannot have been a factor in the species' extinctions, because there is no evidence that the humans had any significant contact with the mammals. Further, archaeologists have discovered numerous sites where the bones of fish had been discarded, but they found no such areas containing the bones of large mammals, so the humans cannot have hunted the mammals. Therefore, some climate change or other environmental factor must have caused the species' extinctions.
Write a response in which you examine assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove .
According to the argument, the author suggests that humans cannot have been a factor in the species' extinctions. At first glance, the argument seems persuasive; however, unsubstantiated assumptions lead me to conclude that this argument is flawed on many grounds.
First and foremost, the author assumes that no evidence indicates that humans did not have any significant contact with the mammals. However, we cannot corroborate that humans had no contact with the mammals solely because there is no evidence. What I mean is that, it is plausible that humans did affect the mammals and there were evidences, but archeologists have not found those yet. Even if there has been no evidence in the Earth, it is still possible that humans led the extinction indirectly. For example, they could have all foods for the mammals or get rid of their habitats by deforestation. Thus, the author needs to take into consideration other possibilities that can led the extinctions.
Secondly, another assumption the author makes is that we can deduce that humans did not hunt the mammals because no mammal bones in the conjectural human habitats. Yet we also cannot substantiate that humans did not hunt the large mammals like the aforementioned reason. It is likely that scholars have not found those bones yet. Also, since we do not have solid information on the mammal bones, it is also possible that bones of large mammals can be corrupted more easily than the bones of fish can. This is sound in that the extinction is occurred more than 4,000 years ago. Therefore, it is far-fetched to say that humans did not hunt the large mammals because there is no evidence on that.
Last but not lease, the author falsely assumes that he can conclude that some climate change or other environmental factor must be yielded by the nation, not by humans. However, it is illogical due to the possibility that humans made the climate change or other environmental factors. As I mentioned in the first paragraph, people could make those changes indirectly. For example, they made a mistake caring their fire so they generated a huge fire in the forest. Or they could hunt all the small animals which are the prey of the large mammals. In these cases, since humans made the environmental changes, humans still can be the reason of the extinctions. Therefore, the author should rule out this assumption to make the soundness of the conclusion.
In brief, the argument is illogical in many respects. In order to bolster the argument, the author needs to eliminate unsubstantiated assumptions that humans did not made the extinctions because there is no evidence and the assumption that other environmental factors are only due to the nation.
- SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's current headquarters. Moreover, Mi 60
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of Parson City's local newspaper. In our region of Trillura, the majority of money spent on the schools that most students attend—the city-run public schools—comes from taxes that each city government colle 87
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants. Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little im 63
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend. Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work 80
- Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7,000 years ago, and within 3,000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands had become extinct. Yet humans cannot have been a factor in the species' extinctions, b 30
argument 1 -- not OK
argument 2 -- not OK
argument 3 -- not OK
--------------------
read a sample:
http://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-argument-task-essays/humans-arrived-kali…
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: ? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 453 350
No. of Characters: 2208 1500
No. of Different Words: 188 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.613 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.874 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.707 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 149 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 105 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 69 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 47 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.696 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.636 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.783 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.332 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.521 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.139 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5